Lune

ICSE2020顶会

Learning-to-rank vs ranking-to-learn: strategies for regression testing in continuous integration

Antonia Bertolino, Antonio Guerriero, Breno Miranda, Roberto Pietrantuono, Stefano Russo

2020年份
81被引次数
8顶会引用

摘要

In Continuous Integration (CI), regression testing is constrained by the time between commits. This demands for careful selection and/or prioritization of test cases within test suites too large to be run entirely. To this aim, some Machine Learning (ML) techniques have been proposed, as an alternative to deterministic approaches. Two broad strategies for ML-based prioritization are learning-torank and what we call ranking-to-learn (i.e., reinforcement learning). Various ML algorithms can be applied in each strategy. In this paper we introduce ten of such algorithms for adoption in CI practices, and perform a comprehensive study comparing them against each other using subjects from the Apache Commons project. We analyze the influence of several features of the code under test and of the test process. The results allow to draw criteria to support testers in selecting and tuning the technique that best fits their context. CCS CONCEPTS • Software and its engineering → Software testing and debugging.

问问这篇 Paper

智能体会读完全文。

Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了最后一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。

可以从这些问题问起

智能体调用

Luneget_paper_fulltext

在 Lune 里问

免费开始,无需绑卡

lune papers fulltext eebf960d-954c-419a-bf3c-ce97fe7ea069

引用它的顶会 Paper8

问问它们各自怎么用它

相关 Paper

黄昏的海面,两侧是细线勾勒的悬崖