Sibyl: Improving Software Engineering Tools with SMT Selection
Will Leeson, Matthew B. Dwyer, Antonio Filieri
摘要
SMT solvers are often used in the back end of different software engineering tools─e.g., program verifiers, test generators, or program synthesizers. There are a plethora of algorithmic techniques for solving SMT queries. Among the available SMT solvers, each employs its own combination of algorithmic techniques that are optimized for different fragments of logics and problem types. The most efficient solver can change with small changes in the SMT query, which makes it nontrivial to decide which solver to use. Consequently, designers of software engineering tools often select a single solver, based on familiarity or convenience, and tailor their tool towards it. Choosing an SMT solver at design time misses the opportunity to optimize query solve times and, for tools where SMT solving is a bottleneck, the performance loss can be significant. In this work, we present Sibyl, an automated SMT selector based on graph neural networks (GNNs). Sibyl creates a graph representation of a given SMT query and uses GNNs to predict how each solver in a suite of SMT solvers would perform on said query. Sibyl learns to predict based on features of SMT queries that are specific to the population on which it is trained - avoiding the need for manual feature engineering. Once trained, Sibyl makes fast and accurate predictions which can substantially reduce the time needed to solve a set of SMT queries. We evaluate Sibyl in four scenarios in which SMT solvers are used: in competition, in a symbolic execution engine, in a bounded model checker, and in a program synthesis tool. We find that Sibyl improves upon the state of the art in nearly every case and provide evidence that it generalizes better than existing techniques. Further, we evaluate Sibyl's overhead and demonstrate that it has the potential to speedup a variety of different software engineering tools.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
它引用的顶会 Paper4
- Building powerful and equivariant graph neural networks with structural message-passingClément Vignac, Andreas Loukas, Pascal FrossardNeurIPS 2020 · 被引用 141 次
- Reconciling enumerative and deductive program synthesisKangjing Huang, Xiaokang Qiu, Peiyuan Shen, Yanjun WangPLDI 2020 · 被引用 46 次
- Learning to Explore Paths for Symbolic ExecutionJingxuan He, Gishor Sivanrupan, Petar Tsankov, Martin T. VechevCCS 2021 · 被引用 39 次
- Multiplex Symbolic Execution: Exploring Multiple Paths by Solving OnceYufeng Zhang, Zhenbang Chen, Ziqi Shuai, Tianqi Zhang 等ASE 2020 · 被引用 17 次
相关 Paper
- SMTgazer: Learning to Schedule SMT Algorithms via Bayesian OptimizationChuan Luo, Shaoke Cui, Jianping Song, Xindi Zhang 等ASE 2025
- High-level synthesis performance prediction using GNNs: benchmarking, modeling, and advancingNan Wu, Hang Yang, Yuan Xie, Pan Li 等DAC 2022 · 被引用 57 次
- Synthesize solving strategy for symbolic executionZhenbang Chen, Zehua Chen, Ziqi Shuai, Guofeng Zhang 等ISSTA 2021 · 被引用 13 次
- Automated accelerator optimization aided by graph neural networksAtefeh Sohrabizadeh, Yunsheng Bai, Yizhou Sun, Jason CongDAC 2022 · 被引用 48 次
- Online Prompt Selection for Program SynthesisYixuan Li, Lewis Frampton, Federico Mora, Elizabeth PolgreenAAAI 2025 · 被引用 2 次
