Affective Design: The Influence of Facebook Reactions on the Emotional Expression of the 114th US Congress
Jacob Erickson, Bei Yan
摘要
Political communication is critical for democracy, but polarized emotions in communication may make careful deliberation difficult. Much of modern political communication occurs on social media, which may exacerbate these challenges. This study examines how the design of social media features impact political communication. We examined how the introduction of Facebook Reactions influenced the posts of the 114th US Congress on the platform. We start by analyzing the emotional content of posts, finding that politicians generally increased their usage of negative emotions in their posts after the feature’s launch. Further analysis showed that increased user engagement preceded the rise in negative emotions, suggesting that politicians were making adjustments based on user feedback. Our results show that the design features of social media can shape online political communication.
问问这篇 Paper
问问你的智能体。
Lune 读过与它相关的顶会 Paper,每个回答都会注明依据哪几篇。
引用它的顶会 Paper1
问问它们各自怎么用它相关 Paper
- "Thoughts & Prayers" or " ❤️ & 🙏 ": How the Release of New Reactions on CaringBridge Reshapes Supportive Communication in Health CrisesC. Estelle Smith, Hannah Miller Hillberg, Zachary LevonianCSCW 2023 · 被引用 17 次
- Political Hashtags & the Lost Art of Democratic DiscourseEugenia Ha Rim Rho, Melissa MazmanianCHI 2020 · 被引用 20 次
- Upvotes? Downvotes? No Votes? Understanding the relationship between reaction mechanisms and political discourse on RedditOrestis Papakyriakopoulos, Severin Engelmann, Amy A. WinecoffCHI 2023 · 被引用 27 次
- What's Gov Got to Do with it?: Pandemic Crisis Communication in a Polarized EnvironmentDi Wang, Marina KoganCSCW 2025 · 被引用 2 次
- Someone Is Wrong on the Internet: Having Hard Conversations in Online SpacesAmanda Baughan, Justin Petelka, Catherine Jaekyung Yoo, Jack Lo 等CSCW 2021 · 被引用 29 次
