Lune

NeurIPS2025顶会

Improved Balanced Classification with Theoretically Grounded Loss Functions

Corinna Cortes, Mehryar Mohri, Yutao Zhong

2025年份
19被引次数
6顶会引用

摘要

The balanced loss is a widely adopted objective for multi-class classification under class imbalance. By assigning equal importance to all classes, regardless of their frequency, it promotes fairness and ensures that minority classes are not overlooked. However, directly minimizing the balanced classification loss is typically intractable, which makes the design of effective surrogate losses a central question. This paper introduces and studies two advanced surrogate loss families: Generalized Logit-Adjusted (GLA) loss functions and Generalized Class-Aware weighted (GCA) losses. GLA losses generalize Logit-Adjusted losses, which shift logits based on class priors, to the broader general cross-entropy loss family. GCA loss functions extend the standard class-weighted losses, which scale losses inversely by class frequency, by incorporating class-dependent confidence margins and extending them to the general cross-entropy family. We present a comprehensive theoretical analysis of consistency for both loss families. We show that GLA losses are Bayes-consistent, but only H-consistent for complete (i.e., unbounded) hypothesis sets. Moreover, their H-consistency bounds depend inversely on the minimum class probability, scaling at least as 1/p min . In contrast, GCA losses are H-consistent for any hypothesis set that is bounded or complete, with H-consistency bounds that scale more favorably as 1/ √ p min , offering significantly stronger theoretical guarantees in imbalanced settings. We report the results of experiments demonstrating that, empirically, both the GCA losses with calibrated class-dependent confidence margins and GLA losses can greatly outperform straightforward class-weighted losses as well as the LA losses. GLA generally performs slightly better in common benchmarks, whereas GCA exhibits a slight edge in highly imbalanced settings. Thus, we advocate for both GLA and GCA losses as principled, theoretically sound, and state-of-the-art surrogates for balanced classification under class imbalance.

问问这篇 Paper

智能体会读完全文。

Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。

可以从这些问题问起

智能体调用

Luneget_paper_fulltext

在 Lune 里问

免费开始,无需绑卡

引用它的顶会 Paper6

问问它们各自怎么用它

它引用的顶会 Paper57

相关 Paper

黄昏的海面,两侧是细线勾勒的悬崖