Symbol tuning improves in-context learning in language models
Jerry W. Wei, Le Hou, Andrew K. Lampinen, Xiangning Chen, Da Huang, Yi Tay, Xinyun Chen, Yifeng Lu, Denny Zhou, Tengyu Ma, Quoc V. Le
摘要
We present symbol tuning-finetuning language models on in-context input-label pairs where natural language labels (e.g., "positive/negative sentiment") are replaced with arbitrary symbols (e.g., "foo/bar"). Symbol tuning leverages the intuition that when a model cannot use instructions or natural language labels to figure out a task, it must instead do so by learning the input-label mappings. We experiment with symbol tuning across PaLM models up to 540B parameters and observe benefits across various settings. First, symbol tuning boosts performance on unseen in-context learning tasks and is much more robust to underspecified prompts, such as those without instructions or without natural language labels. Second, symbol-tuned models are much stronger at algorithmic reasoning tasks, with up to 18.2% better performance on the List Functions benchmark and up to 15.3% better performance on the Simple Turing Concepts benchmark. Finally, symbol-tuned models show large improvements in following flipped-labels presented in-context, meaning that they are more capable of using in-context information to override prior knowledge. * Work done as a Student Researcher at Google. † Work done as a Visiting Researcher at Google.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper21
- A Survey on In-context LearningQingxiu Dong, Lei Li, Damai Dai, Ce Zheng 等EMNLP 2024 · 被引用 479 次
- Long-form factuality in large language modelsJerry Wei, Chengrun Yang, Xinying Song, Yifeng Lu 等NeurIPS 2024 · 被引用 182 次
- What needs to go right for an induction head? A mechanistic study of in-context learning circuits and their formationAaditya K. Singh, Ted Moskovitz, Felix Hill, Stephanie C. Y. Chan 等ICML 2024 · 被引用 77 次
- Why Larger Language Models Do In-context Learning Differently?Zhenmei Shi, Junyi Wei, Zhuoyan Xu, Yingyu LiangICML 2024 · 被引用 54 次
- Advancing Expert Specialization for Better MoEHongcan Guo, Haolang Lu, Guoshun Nan, Bolun Chu 等NeurIPS 2025 · 被引用 48 次
它引用的顶会 Paper17
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah 等NeurIPS 2020 · 被引用 64,255 次
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida 等NeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 24,707 次
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma 等NeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 22,562 次
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou 等ICLR 2021 · 被引用 7,905 次
- PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural LanguageYonatan Bisk, Rowan Zellers, Ronan Le Bras, Jianfeng Gao 等AAAI 2020 · 被引用 2,916 次
相关 Paper
- Can Large Language Models Understand Symbolic Graphics Programs?Zeju Qiu, Weiyang Liu, Haiwen Feng, Zhen Liu 等ICLR 2025
- TART: A plug-and-play Transformer module for task-agnostic reasoningKush Bhatia, Avanika Narayan, Christopher De Sa, Christopher RéNeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 19 次
- Finetuned Language Models are Zero-Shot LearnersJason Wei, Maarten Bosma, Vincent Y. Zhao, Kelvin Guu 等ICLR 2022 · 被引用 4,966 次
- PAL: Program-aided Language ModelsLuyu Gao, Aman Madaan, Shuyan Zhou, Uri Alon 等ICML 2023 · 被引用 700 次
- Large Language Models Can Self-ImproveJiaxin Huang, Shixiang Gu, Le Hou, Yuexin Wu 等EMNLP 2023 · 被引用 184 次
