DGP: A Dual-Granularity Prompting Framework for Fraud Detection with Graph-Enhanced LLMs
Yuan Li, Jun Hu, Bryan Hooi, Bingsheng He, Cheng Chen
摘要
Real-world fraud detection applications benefits from graph learning techniques that jointly exploit node features-often rich in textual data-and graph structural information. Recently, Graph-Enhanced LLMs emerge as a promising graph learning approach that converts graph information into prompts, exploiting LLMs' ability to reason over both textual and structural information. Among them, text-only prompting, which converts graph information to prompts consisting solely of text tokens, offers a solution that relies only on LLM tuning without requiring additional graph-specific encoders. However, text-only prompting struggles on heterogeneous fraud-detection graphs: multi-hop relations expand exponentially with each additional hop, leading to rapidly growing neighborhoods associated with dense textual information. These neighborhoods may overwhelm the model with long, irrelevant content in the prompt and suppress key signals from the target node, thereby degrading performance. To address this challenge, we propose Dual Granularity Prompting (DGP), which mitigates information overload by preserving fine-grained textual details for the target node while summarizing neighbor information into coarse-grained text prompts. DGP introduces tailored summarization strategies for different data modalities-bi-level semantic abstraction for textual fields and statistical aggregation for numerical featuresenabling effective compression of verbose neighbor content into concise, informative prompts. Experiments across public and industrial datasets demonstrate that DGP operates within a manageable token budget while improving fraud detection performance by up to 6.8% (AUPRC) over state-of-the-art methods, showing the potential of Graph-Enhanced LLMs for fraud detection. Relation Types Same-User (RUR) Same-Time (RTR) Same-Star (RSR) Textual Summarization Numerical Summarization r 1 =2.0 r 3 =1.0 r 0 =5.0 r 2 =2.0 No -5.0 Yes -2.9 Logit p( )=89% v 0 c 1 =<0,1> c 3 =<1,0> c 0 =<1,0> c 2 =<1,0> rating (1-5) category <food,hotel> p( )=11%
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper1
问问它们各自怎么用它它引用的顶会 Paper12
- LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu 等ICLR 2022 · 被引用 18,833 次
- Can Language Models Solve Graph Problems in Natural Language?Heng Wang, Shangbin Feng, Tianxing He, Zhaoxuan Tan 等NeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 420 次
- Talk like a Graph: Encoding Graphs for Large Language ModelsBahare Fatemi, Jonathan Halcrow, Bryan PerozziICLR 2024 · 被引用 194 次
- GraphGPT: Graph Instruction Tuning for Large Language ModelsJiabin Tang, Yuhao Yang, Wei Wei, Lei Shi 等SIGIR 2024 · 被引用 182 次
- Harnessing Explanations: LLM-to-LM Interpreter for Enhanced Text-Attributed Graph Representation LearningXiaoxin He, Xavier Bresson, Thomas Laurent, Adam Perold 等ICLR 2024 · 被引用 151 次
相关 Paper
- Can LLMs Find Fraudsters? Multi-level LLM Enhanced Graph Fraud DetectionTairan Huang, Yili Wang, Qiutong Li, Changlong He 等ACM MM 2025 · 被引用 10 次
- Actions Speak Louder than Prompts: A Large-Scale Study of LLMs for Graph InferenceBen Finkelshtein, Silviu Cucerzan, Sujay Kumar Jauhar, Ryen W WhiteICLR 2026 · 被引用 5 次
- Targeting Borderline Fraudsters: Multi-View Hypergraph Fraud Detection with LLM-Guided Contrastive LearningRui Ou, Kun Zhu, Nana Zhang, Jiangtong Li 等AAAI 2026
- Large Language Models are Good Relational LearnersFang Wu, Vijay Prakash Dwivedi, Jure LeskovecACL 2025 · 被引用 10 次
- DuoKD: Dual Knowledge Distillation from Large Language Models for Robust Graph Neural NetworksCuiying Huo, Xiaotong Huang, Dongxiao He, Yixuan Du 等AAAI 2026
