Breaking the Illusion: Automated Reasoning of GDPR Consent Violations
Ying Li, Wenjun Qiu, Faysal Hossain Shezan, Kunlin Cai, Michelangelo van Dam, Lisa M. Austin, David Lie, Yuan Tian
摘要
Recent privacy regulations such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) have established legal requirements for obtaining user consent regarding the collection, use, and sharing of personal data. These regulations emphasize that consent must be informed, freely given, specific, and unambiguous. However, there are still many violations, which highlight a gap between legal expectations and actual implementation. Consent mechanisms embedded in functional web forms across websites play a critical role in ensuring compliance with data protection regulations such as the GDPR and CCPA, as well as in upholding user autonomy and trust. However, current research has primarily focused on cookie banners and mobile app dialogs. These forms are diverse in structure, vary in legal basis, and are often difficult to locate or evaluate, creating a significant challenge for automated consent compliance auditing. In this work, we present Cosmic, a novel automated framework for detecting consent-related privacy violations in web forms. Cosmic integrates three key innovations: (1) a large language model (LLM)-based framework to extract consent requirements from privacy policies and locate relevant forms using multimodal web agents; (2) a domain-specific language (DSL) to formally describe heterogeneous web form structures, enabling systematic analysis; and (3) machine-interpretable Datalog rules, derived in collaboration with privacy experts, to translate natural-language GDPR requirements into formal logic for automated verification. We evaluate our developed tool for auditing consent compliance in web forms, across 5,823 websites and 3,598 forms. Cosmic detects 3,384 violations on 94.1% of consent forms, covering key GDPR principles such as freely given consent, purpose disclosure, and withdrawal options. It achieves 98.6% and 99.1% TPR for consent and violation detection, respectively, demonstrating high accuracy and real-world applicability.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
它引用的顶会 Paper25
- Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP TasksPatrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni 等NeurIPS 2020 · 被引用 19,162 次
- WebArena: A Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous AgentsShuyan Zhou, Frank F. Xu, Hao Zhu, Xuhui Zhou 等ICLR 2024 · 被引用 1,197 次
- (Un)informed Consent: Studying GDPR Consent Notices in the FieldChristine Utz, Martin Degeling, Sascha Fahl, Florian Schaub 等CCS 2019 · 被引用 429 次
- Polisis: Automated Analysis and Presentation of Privacy Policies Using Deep LearningHamza Harkous, Kassem Fawaz, Rémi Lebret, Florian Schaub 等USENIX Security 2018 · 被引用 400 次
- Automated Analysis of Privacy Requirements for Mobile AppsSebastian Zimmeck, Ziqi Wang, Lieyong Zou, Roger Iyengar 等NDSS 2017 · 被引用 255 次
相关 Paper
- CSChecker: Revisiting GDPR and CCPA Compliance of Cookie Banners on the WebMingxue Zhang, Wei Meng, You Zhou, Kui RenICSE 2024 · 被引用 5 次
- Automated Large-Scale Analysis of Cookie Notice ComplianceAhmed Bouhoula, Karel Kubicek, Amit Zac, Carlos Cotrini 等USENIX Security 2024 · 被引用 25 次
- Freely Given Consent?: Studying Consent Notice of Third-Party Tracking and Its Violations of GDPR in Android AppsTrung Tin Nguyen, Michael Backes, Ben StockCCS 2022 · 被引用 32 次
- Navigating Cookie Consent Violations Across the GlobeBrian Tang, Duc Bui, Kang G. ShinUSENIX Security 2025
- Do Cookie Banners Respect my Choice? : Measuring Legal Compliance of Banners from IAB Europe's Transparency and Consent FrameworkCélestin Matte, Nataliia Bielova, Cristiana Teixeira SantosS&P 2020 · 被引用 212 次
