PCoT: Persuasion-Augmented Chain of Thought for Detecting Fake News and Social Media Disinformation
Arkadiusz Modzelewski, Witold Sosnowski, Tiziano Labruna, Adam Wierzbicki, Giovanni Da San Martino
摘要
Disinformation detection is a key aspect of media literacy. Psychological studies have shown that knowledge of persuasive fallacies helps individuals detect disinformation. Inspired by these findings, we experimented with large language models (LLMs) to test whether infusing persuasion knowledge enhances disinformation detection. As a result, we introduce the Persuasion-Augmented Chain of Thought (PCoT), a novel approach that leverages persuasion to improve disinformation detection in zero-shot classification. We extensively evaluate PCoT on online news and social media posts. Moreover, we publish two novel, up-to-date disinformation datasets: EUDisinfo and MultiDis. These datasets enable the evaluation of PCoT on content entirely unseen by the LLMs used in our experiments, as the content was published after the models'knowledge cutoffs. We show that, on average, PCoT outperforms competitive methods by 15% across five LLMs and five datasets. These findings highlight the value of persuasion in strengthening zero-shot disinformation detection.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了最后一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper2
- Reasoning About the Unsaid: Misinformation Detection with Omission-Aware Graph InferenceZhengjia Wang, Danding Wang, Qiang Sheng, Jiaying Wu 等AAAI 2026 · 被引用 2 次
- Are Rationales Necessary and Sufficient? Tuning LLMs for Explainable Misinformation DetectionBing Wang, Rui Miao, Ximing Li, Chen Shen 等KDD 2026 · 被引用 1 次
它引用的顶会 Paper9
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo 等NeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 8,168 次
- Can LLM-Generated Misinformation Be Detected?Canyu Chen, Kai ShuICLR 2024 · 被引用 270 次
- Birds of a feather don't fact-check each other: Partisanship and the evaluation of news in Twitter's Birdwatch crowdsourced fact-checking programJennifer Allen, Cameron Martel, David G. RandCHI 2022 · 被引用 104 次
- With Little Power Comes Great ResponsibilityDallas Card, Peter Henderson, Urvashi Khandelwal, Robin Jia 等EMNLP 2020 · 被引用 76 次
- Towards Reliable Misinformation Mitigation: Generalization, Uncertainty, and GPT-4Kellin Pelrine, Anne Imouza, Camille Thibault, Meilina Reksoprodjo 等EMNLP 2023 · 被引用 27 次
相关 Paper
- Are LLMs Good Zero-Shot Fallacy Classifiers?Fengjun Pan, Xiaobao Wu, Zongrui Li, Anh Tuan LuuEMNLP 2024 · 被引用 7 次
- Truth or Sophistry? LoFa: A Benchmark for LLM Robustness Against Logical FallaciesXudong Shen, Li Yuan, Ye Chen, Xin Wu 等ACL 2026
- Fighting Fire with Fire: The Dual Role of LLMs in Crafting and Detecting Elusive DisinformationJason Samuel Lucas, Adaku Uchendu, Michiharu Yamashita, Jooyoung Lee 等EMNLP 2023 · 被引用 23 次
- How Good (Or Bad) Are LLMs at Detecting Misleading Visualizations?Leo Yu-Ho Lo, Huamin QuIEEE VIS 2024 · 被引用 24 次
- Hidden in Plain Sight: Evaluation of the Deception Detection Capabilities of LLMs in Multimodal SettingsMd Messal Monem Miah, Adrita Anika, Xi Shi, Ruihong HuangACL 2025
