Spread Spurious Attribute: Improving Worst-group Accuracy with Spurious Attribute Estimation
Jun Hyun Nam, Jaehyung Kim, Jaeho Lee, Jinwoo Shin
摘要
The paradigm of worst-group loss minimization has shown its promise in avoiding to learn spurious correlations, but requires costly additional supervision on spurious attributes. To resolve this, recent works focus on developing weaker forms of supervision -- e.g., hyperparameters discovered with a small number of validation samples with spurious attribute annotation -- but none of the methods retain comparable performance to methods using full supervision on the spurious attribute. In this paper, instead of searching for weaker supervisions, we ask: Given access to a fixed number of samples with spurious attribute annotations, what is the best achievable worst-group loss if we"fully exploit"them? To this end, we propose a pseudo-attribute-based algorithm, coined Spread Spurious Attribute (SSA), for improving the worst-group accuracy. In particular, we leverage samples both with and without spurious attribute annotations to train a model to predict the spurious attribute, then use the pseudo-attribute predicted by the trained model as supervision on the spurious attribute to train a new robust model having minimal worst-group loss. Our experiments on various benchmark datasets show that our algorithm consistently outperforms the baseline methods using the same number of validation samples with spurious attribute annotations. We also demonstrate that the proposed SSA can achieve comparable performances to methods using full (100%) spurious attribute supervision, by using a much smaller number of annotated samples -- from 0.6% and up to 1.5%, depending on the dataset.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper42
- On Feature Learning in the Presence of Spurious CorrelationsPavel Izmailov, Polina Kirichenko, Nate Gruver, Andrew Gordon WilsonNeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 208 次
- Change is Hard: A Closer Look at Subpopulation ShiftYuzhe Yang, Haoran Zhang, Dina Katabi, Marzyeh GhassemiICML 2023 · 被引用 149 次
- Contrastive Adapters for Foundation Model Group RobustnessMichael Zhang, Christopher RéNeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 94 次
- Towards Last-layer Retraining for Group Robustness with Fewer AnnotationsTyler LaBonte, Vidya Muthukumar, Abhishek KumarNeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 73 次
- Learning Debiased Classifier with Biased CommitteeNayeong Kim, Sehyun Hwang, Sungsoo Ahn, Jaesik Park 等NeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 73 次
它引用的顶会 Paper9
- Supervised Contrastive LearningPrannay Khosla, Piotr Teterwak, Chen Wang, Aaron Sarna 等NeurIPS 2020 · 被引用 7,049 次
- FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and ConfidenceKihyuk Sohn, David Berthelot, Nicholas Carlini, Zizhao Zhang 等NeurIPS 2020 · 被引用 5,129 次
- WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution ShiftsPang Wei Koh, Shiori Sagawa, Henrik Marklund, Sang Michael Xie 等ICML 2021 · 被引用 1,773 次
- Just Train Twice: Improving Group Robustness without Training Group InformationEvan Zheran Liu, Behzad Haghgoo, Annie S. Chen, Aditi Raghunathan 等ICML 2021 · 被引用 683 次
- Environment Inference for Invariant LearningElliot Creager, Jörn-Henrik Jacobsen, Richard S. ZemelICML 2021 · 被引用 454 次
相关 Paper
- Improving Group Robustness on Spurious Correlation Requires Preciser Group InferenceYujin Han, Difan ZouICML 2024 · 被引用 13 次
- Correct-N-Contrast: a Contrastive Approach for Improving Robustness to Spurious CorrelationsMichael Zhang, Nimit Sharad Sohoni, Hongyang R. Zhang, Chelsea Finn 等ICML 2022 · 被引用 230 次
- Spurious Correlation-Aware Embedding Regularization for Worst-Group RobustnessSubeen Park, JOOWANG KIM, Hakyung Lee, Sunjae yoo 等ICLR 2026 · 被引用 2 次
- Does Weak-to-strong Generalization Happen under Spurious Correlations?Chenruo Liu, Yijun Dong, Qi LeiICLR 2026 · 被引用 1 次
- Robust Learning with Progressive Data Expansion Against Spurious CorrelationYihe Deng, Yu Yang, Baharan Mirzasoleiman, Quanquan GuNeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 53 次
