How Far Can Transformers Reason? The Globality Barrier and Inductive Scratchpad
Emmanuel Abbe, Samy Bengio, Aryo Lotfi, Colin Sandon, Omid Saremi
摘要
Can Transformers predict new syllogisms by composing established ones? More generally, what type of targets can be learned by such models from scratch? Recent works show that Transformers can be Turing-complete in terms of expressivity, but this does not address the learnability objective. This paper puts forward the notion of 'globality degree' of a target distribution to capture when weak learning is efficiently achievable by regular Transformers. This measure shows a contrast with the expressivity results of Transformers captured by classes (further studied here), since the globality relates to correlations with the more limited class. We show here experimentally and theoretically under additional assumptions that distributions with high globality cannot be learned efficiently. In particular, syllogisms cannot be composed on long chains. Further, we develop scratchpad techniques and show that: (i) agnostic scratchpads cannot break the globality barrier, (ii) educated scratchpads can break the globality with intermediate steps, although not all such scratchpads can generalize out-of-distribution (OOD), (iii) a notion of 'inductive scratchpad', that composes the prior information more efficiently, can both break the globality barrier and improve the OOD generalization. In particular, some of our inductive scratchpads can achieve length generalizations of up to for some arithmetic tasks depending on the input formatting.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper19
- Transformers Provably Learn Chain-of-Thought Reasoning with Length GeneralizationYu Huang, Zixin Wen, Aarti Singh, Yuejie Chi 等NeurIPS 2025 · 被引用 22 次
- Know What You Don't Know: Uncertainty Calibration of Process Reward ModelsYoung-Jin Park, Kristjan Greenewald, Kaveh Alimohammadi, Hao Wang 等NeurIPS 2025 · 被引用 21 次
- RL for Reasoning by Adaptively Revealing RationalesMohammad Hossein Amani, Aryo Lotfi, Nicolas Baldwin, Samy Bengio 等ICLR 2026 · 被引用 19 次
- Let Me Think! A Long Chain of Thought Can Be Worth Exponentially Many Short OnesParsa Mirtaheri, Ezra Edelman, Samy Jelassi, Eran Malach 等NeurIPS 2025 · 被引用 12 次
- Lost in Transmission: When and Why LLMs Fail to Reason GloballyTobias Schnabel, Kiran Tomlinson, Adith Swaminathan, Jennifer NevilleNeurIPS 2025 · 被引用 9 次
它引用的顶会 Paper43
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma 等NeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 22,562 次
- An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at ScaleAlexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn 等ICLR 2021 · 被引用 21,477 次
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo 等NeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 8,168 次
- Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language ModelsAitor Lewkowycz, Anders Andreassen, David Dohan, Ethan Dyer 等NeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 2,039 次
- Train Short, Test Long: Attention with Linear Biases Enables Input Length ExtrapolationOfir Press, Noah A. Smith, Mike LewisICLR 2022 · 被引用 1,168 次
相关 Paper
- Exploring Length Generalization in Large Language ModelsCem Anil, Yuhuai Wu, Anders Andreassen, Aitor Lewkowycz 等NeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 267 次
- Lower Bounds for Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Hard-Attention TransformersAlireza Amiri Bavandpour, Xinting Huang, Mark Rofin, Michael HahnICML 2025
- Revisiting Padded Transformer Expressivity: Which Architectural Choices Matter and Which Don'tAnej Svete, William Merrill, Ryan Cotterell, Ashish SabharwalICML 2026 · 被引用 3 次
- Exact Expressive Power of Transformers with PaddingWilliam Merrill, Ashish SabharwalNeurIPS 2025 · 被引用 21 次
- Universal Length Generalization with Turing ProgramsKaiying Hou, David Brandfonbrener, Sham M. Kakade, Samy Jelassi 等ICML 2025
