Fortifying Federated Learning Towards Trustworthiness via Auditable Data Valuation and Verifiable Client Contribution
K. Naveen Kumar, Ranjeet Ranjan Jha, C. Krishna Mohan, Ravindra Babu Tallamraju
摘要
Ensuring auditability and verifiability in Federated Learning (FL) is both challenging and essential to guarantee that local data remains untampered and client updates are trustworthy. Recent FL frameworks assess client contributions through a trusted central server using various client selection and aggregation techniques. However, reliance on a central server can create a single point of failure, making it vulnerable to privacy-centric attacks and limiting its ability to audit and verify client-side data contributions due to restricted access. In addition, data quality and fairness evaluations are often inadequate, failing to distinguish between high-impact contributions and those from low-quality or poisoned data. To address these challenges, we propose Federated Auditable and Verifiable Data valuation (FAVD), a privacy-preserving method that ensures auditability and verifiability of client contributions through data valuation, independent of any central authority or predefined training algorithm. FAVD utilizes shared local data density functions to construct a global density function, aligning data contributions and facilitating effective valuation prior to local model training. This proactive approach improves transparency in data valuation and ensures that only benign updates are generated, even in the presence of malicious data. Further, to mitigate privacy risks associated with sharing data density functions, we add Gaussian noise to each client's local density function before sharing it with the server. We theoretically demonstrate the convergence, auditability, and verifiability of FAVD, along with its resilience against data poisoning threats. Our experiments on five diverse benchmarks, including three medical datasets, show that FAVD achieves significant performance gains, accurate data valuation, and fair client contributions under threat, highlighting its reliability as a trustworthy FL approach.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了最后一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper2
- Incentives in Federated Learning with Heterogeneous AgentsAriel D. Procaccia, Han Shao, Itai ShapiraICLR 2026 · 被引用 3 次
- BESplit: Bias-Compensated Split Federated Learning with Evidential AggregationYuhan Xie, Chen Lyu, Jingrong HuangICML 2026
它引用的顶会 Paper16
- Back to the Drawing Board: A Critical Evaluation of Poisoning Attacks on Production Federated LearningVirat Shejwalkar, Amir Houmansadr, Peter Kairouz, Daniel RamageS&P 2022 · 被引用 302 次
- FLDetector: Defending Federated Learning Against Model Poisoning Attacks via Detecting Malicious ClientsZaixi Zhang, Xiaoyu Cao, Jinyuan Jia, Neil Zhenqiang GongKDD 2022 · 被引用 293 次
- Gradient Driven Rewards to Guarantee Fairness in Collaborative Machine LearningXinyi Xu, Lingjuan Lyu, Xingjun Ma, Chenglin Miao 等NeurIPS 2021 · 被引用 133 次
- Auditing Privacy Defenses in Federated Learning via Generative Gradient LeakageZhuohang Li, Jiaxin Zhang, Luyang Liu, Jian LiuCVPR 2022 · 被引用 118 次
- Measuring the Effect of Training Data on Deep Learning Predictions via Randomized ExperimentsJinkun Lin, Anqi Zhang, Mathias Lécuyer, Jinyang Li 等ICML 2022 · 被引用 70 次
相关 Paper
- SAFER-FL: Adversarially Robust Federated Learning in IoT Networks via Latent Space Auditing and Verifiable ContributionsNaveen Kumar Kummari, Mohsen GuizaniINFOCOM 2026
- Data Valuation and Detections in Federated LearningWenqian Li, Shuran Fu, Fengrui Zhang, Yan PangCVPR 2024
- FedVal: Different good or different bad in federated learningViktor Valadi, Xinchi Qiu, Pedro Porto Buarque de Gusmão, Nicholas D. Lane 等USENIX Security 2023
- FedInv: Byzantine-Robust Federated Learning by Inversing Local Model UpdatesBo Zhao, Peng Sun, Tao Wang, Keyu JiangAAAI 2022 · 被引用 82 次
- Towards the Robustness of Differentially Private Federated LearningTao Qi, Huili Wang, Yongfeng HuangAAAI 2024 · 被引用 30 次
