Lower Bounds on Lattice Sieving and Information Set Decoding
Elena Kirshanova, Thijs Laarhoven
摘要
. In two of the main areas of post-quantum cryptography, based on lattices and codes, nearest neighbor techniques have been used to speed up state-of-the-art cryptanalytic algorithms, and to obtain the lowest asymptotic cost estimates to date [May–Ozerov, Eurocrypt’15; Becker–Ducas–Gama– Laarhoven, SODA’16]. These upper bounds are useful for assessing the security of cryptosystems against known attacks, but to guarantee long-term security one would like to have closely matching lower bounds, showing that improvements on the algorithmic side will not drastically reduce the security in the future. As existing lower bounds from the nearest neighbor literature do not apply to the nearest neighbor problems appearing in this context, one might wonder whether further speedups to these cryptanalytic algorithms can still be found by only improving the nearest neighbor subroutines. We derive new lower bounds on the costs of solving the nearest neighbor search problems appearing in these cryptanalytic settings. For the Euclidean metric we show that for random data sets on the sphere, the locality-sensitive filtering approach of [Becker–Ducas–Gama–Laarhoven, SODA 2016] using spherical caps is optimal, and hence within a broad class of lattice sieving algorithms covering almost all approaches to date, their asymptotic time complexity of 2 0 . 292 d + o ( d ) is optimal. Similar conditional optimality results apply to lattice sieving variants, such as the 2 0 . 265 d + o ( d ) complexity for quantum sieving [Laarhoven, PhD thesis 2016] and previously derived complexity estimates for tuple sieving [Herold–Kirshanova–Laarhoven, PKC 2018]. For the Hamming metric we derive new lower bounds for nearest neighbor searching which almost match the best upper bounds from the literature [May– Ozerov, Eurocrypt 2015]. As a consequence we derive conditional lower bounds on decoding attacks, showing that also here one should search for improvements elsewhere to significantly undermine security estimates from the literature.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了最后一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
它引用的顶会 Paper1
相关 Paper
- Asymptotics and Improvements of Sieving for CodesLéo Ducas, Andre Esser, Simona Etinski, Elena KirshanovaEUROCRYPT 2024 · 被引用 14 次
- An Improved Quantum Algorithm for 3-Tuple Lattice SievingLynn Engelberts, Yanlin Chen, Amin Shiraz Gilani, Maya-Iggy van Hoof 等CRYPTO 2026
- Implementing Grover Oracles for Quantum Key Search on AES and LowMCSamuel Jaques, Michael Naehrig, Martin Roetteler, Fernando VirdiaEUROCRYPT 2020 · 被引用 226 次
- Falconn++: A Locality-sensitive Filtering Approach for Approximate Nearest Neighbor SearchNinh Pham, Tao LiuNeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 20 次
- Learning to Hash Robustly, GuaranteedAlexandr Andoni, Daniel BeagleholeICML 2022 · 被引用 12 次
