A Bayesian Approach To Analysing Training Data Attribution In Deep Learning
Elisa Nguyen, Minjoon Seo, Seong Joon Oh
摘要
Training data attribution (TDA) techniques find influential training data for the model's prediction on the test data of interest. They approximate the impact of down- or up-weighting a particular training sample. While conceptually useful, they are hardly applicable to deep models in practice, particularly because of their sensitivity to different model initialisation. In this paper, we introduce a Bayesian perspective on the TDA task, where the learned model is treated as a Bayesian posterior and the TDA estimates as random variables. From this novel viewpoint, we observe that the influence of an individual training sample is often overshadowed by the noise stemming from model initialisation and SGD batch composition. Based on this observation, we argue that TDA can only be reliably used for explaining deep model predictions that are consistently influenced by certain training data, independent of other noise factors. Our experiments demonstrate the rarity of such noise-independent training-test data pairs but confirm their existence. We recommend that future researchers and practitioners trust TDA estimates only in such cases. Further, we find a disagreement between ground truth and estimated TDA distributions and encourage future work to study this gap. Code is provided at https://github.com/ElisaNguyen/bayesian-tda.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了最后一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper9
- Training Data Attribution via Approximate UnrollingJuhan Bae, Wu Lin, Jonathan Lorraine, Roger B. GrosseNeurIPS 2024 · 被引用 41 次
- Better Training Data Attribution via Better Inverse Hessian-Vector ProductsAndrew Wang, Elisa Nguyen, Runshi Yang, Juhan Bae 等NeurIPS 2025 · 被引用 12 次
- Final-Model-Only Data Attribution with a Unifying View of Gradient-Based MethodsDennis Wei, Inkit Padhi, Soumya Ghosh, Amit Dhurandhar 等NeurIPS 2025 · 被引用 6 次
- TuCo: Measuring the Contribution of Fine-Tuning to Individual Responses of LLMsFelipe Pinto Coelho Nuti, Tim Franzmeyer, João F. HenriquesICML 2025
- Capturing the Temporal Dependence of Training Data InfluenceJiachen T. Wang, Dawn Song, James Zou, Prateek Mittal 等ICLR 2025
它引用的顶会 Paper8
- An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at ScaleAlexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn 等ICLR 2021 · 被引用 21,477 次
- LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu 等ICLR 2022 · 被引用 18,833 次
- Estimating Training Data Influence by Tracing Gradient DescentGarima Pruthi, Frederick Liu, Satyen Kale, Mukund SundararajanNeurIPS 2020 · 被引用 784 次
- If Influence Functions are the Answer, Then What is the Question?Juhan Bae, Nathan Ng, Alston Lo, Marzyeh Ghassemi 等NeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 185 次
- Scaling Up Influence FunctionsAndrea Schioppa, Polina Zablotskaia, David Vilar, Artem SokolovAAAI 2022 · 被引用 149 次
相关 Paper
- Distributional Training Data Attribution: What do Influence Functions Sample?Bruno Kacper Mlodozeniec, Isaac Reid, Sam Power, David Krueger 等NeurIPS 2025
- Enhancing Training Data Attribution with Representational OptimizationWeiwei Sun, Haokun Liu, Nikhil Kandpal, Colin A. Raffel 等NeurIPS 2025 · 被引用 9 次
- PINNfluence: Interpreting PINNs through Influence FunctionsAleksander Krasowski, Jonas Naujoks, Moritz Weckbecker, Galip Yolcu 等ICML 2026 · 被引用 1 次
- Debugging Tests for Model ExplanationsJulius Adebayo, Michael Muelly, Ilaria Liccardi, Been KimNeurIPS 2020 · 被引用 209 次
- Fourier-transform-based attribution priors improve the interpretability and stability of deep learning models for genomicsAlex Tseng, Avanti Shrikumar, Anshul KundajeNeurIPS 2020 · 被引用 38 次
