Assessing the Impact of a Variant of MATZOV's Dual Attack on Kyber
Kévin Carrier, Charles Meyer-Hilfiger, Yixin Shen, Jean-Pierre Tillich
摘要
. The dual attacks on the Learning With Errors ( LWE ) problem are currently a subject of controversy. In particular, the results of [MAT22], which claim to significantly lower the security level of Kyber [SAB + 20], a lattice-based cryptosystem currently being standardized by NIST, are not widely accepted. The analysis behind their attack depends on a series of assumptions that, in certain scenarios, have been shown to contradict established theorems or well-tested heuristics [DP23b]. In this paper, we introduce a new dual lattice attack on LWE , drawing from ideas in coding theory. Our approach revisits the dual attack proposed by [MAT22], replacing modulus switching with an efficient decoding algorithm. This decoding is achieved by generalizing polar codes over Z q , and we confirm their strong distortion properties through benchmarks. This modification enables a reduction from small-LWE to plain-LWE , with a notable decrease in the secret dimension. Additionally, we replace the enumeration step in the attack by assuming the secret is zero for the portion being enumerated, iterating this assumption over various choices for the enumeration part. We make an analysis of our attack without using the flawed independence assumptions used in [MAT22] and we fully back up our analysis with experimental evidences. Lastly, we assess the complexity of our attack on Kyber ; showing that the security levels for Kyber -512/768/1024 are 3.5/11.9/12.3 bits below the NIST requirements (143/207/272 bits) in the same nearest-neighbor cost model as in [SAB + 20,MAT22]. All in all the cost of our attack matches and even slightly beat in some cases the complexities originally claimed by the attack of [MAT22].
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper1
问问它们各自怎么用它它引用的顶会 Paper4
- Post-quantum Key Exchange - A New HopeErdem Alkim, Léo Ducas, Thomas Pöppelmann, Peter SchwabeUSENIX Security 2016 · 被引用 972 次
- Does the Dual-Sieve Attack on Learning with Errors Even Work?Léo Ducas, Ludo N. PullesCRYPTO 2023 · 被引用 32 次
- Provable Dual Attacks on Learning with ErrorsAmaury Pouly, Yixin ShenEUROCRYPT 2024 · 被引用 18 次
- Reduction from Sparse LPN to LPN, Dual Attack 3.0Kévin Carrier, Thomas Debris-Alazard, Charles Meyer-Hilfiger, Jean-Pierre TillichEUROCRYPT 2024 · 被引用 13 次
相关 Paper
- Benchmarking Attacks on Learning with ErrorsEmily Wenger, Eshika Saxena, Mohamed Malhou, Ellie Thieu 等S&P 2025
- A Quasi-polynomial Time Algorithm for the Extrapolated Dihedral Coset Problem over Power-of-Two ModuliShi Bai, Hansraj Jangir, Elena Kirshanova, Tran Ngo 等CRYPTO 2025 · 被引用 3 次
- SalsaPicante: A Machine Learning Attack on LWE with Binary SecretsCathy Yuanchen Li, Jana Sotáková, Emily Wenger, Mohamed Malhou 等CCS 2023 · 被引用 11 次
- (One) Failure Is Not an Option: Bootstrapping the Search for Failures in Lattice-Based Encryption SchemesJan-Pieter D'Anvers, Mélissa Rossi, Fernando VirdiaEUROCRYPT 2020 · 被引用 2 次
- MPC-in-the-Head Framework without Repetition and its Applications to the Lattice-based CryptographyWeihao Bai, Long Chen, Qianwen Gao, Zhenfeng ZhangS&P 2024 · 被引用 2 次
