Overlap-Adaptive Regularization for Conditional Average Treatment Effect Estimation
Valentyn Melnychuk, Dennis Frauen, Jonas Schweisthal, Stefan Feuerriegel
摘要
The conditional average treatment effect (CATE) is widely used in personalized medicine to inform therapeutic decisions. However, state-of-the-art methods for CATE estimation (so-called meta-learners) often perform poorly in the presence of low overlap. In this work, we introduce a new approach to tackle this issue and improve the performance of existing meta-learners in the low-overlap regions. Specifically, we introduce Overlap-Adaptive Regularization (OAR) that regularizes target models proportionally to overlap weights so that, informally, the regularization is higher in regions with low overlap. To the best of our knowledge, our OAR is the first approach to leverage overlap weights in the regularization terms of the meta-learners. Our OAR approach is flexible and works with any existing CATE meta-learner: we demonstrate how OAR can be applied to both parametric and non-parametric second-stage models. Furthermore, we propose debiased versions of our OAR that preserve the Neyman-orthogonality of existing meta-learners and thus ensure more robust inference. Through a series of (semi-)synthetic experiments, we demonstrate that our OAR significantly improves CATE estimation in low-overlap settings in comparison to constant regularization. 2 By naïvely estimating τ (x) = μ1(x) -μ0(x), plug-in learners suffer from so-called plug-in bias (Kennedy, 2023) (e. g., μ0(x) is badly estimated for treated population). This is addressed in (two-stage) meta-learners. Unlike the plug-in learners, meta-learners allow to solve the bias-variance trade-off for the nuisance functions and the target CATE separately (Morzywolek et al., 2023) . Hence, we focus on (two-stage) meta-learners throughout our paper.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了最后一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper1
问问它们各自怎么用它它引用的顶会 Paper15
- How Does Mixup Help With Robustness and Generalization?Linjun Zhang, Zhun Deng, Kenji Kawaguchi, Amirata Ghorbani 等ICLR 2021 · 被引用 294 次
- Learning Disentangled Representations for CounterFactual RegressionNegar Hassanpour, Russell GreinerICLR 2020 · 被引用 176 次
- The Implicit and Explicit Regularization Effects of DropoutColin Wei, Sham M. Kakade, Tengyu MaICML 2020 · 被引用 129 次
- On Inductive Biases for Heterogeneous Treatment Effect EstimationAlicia Curth, Mihaela van der SchaarNeurIPS 2021 · 被引用 114 次
- Explicit Regularisation in Gaussian Noise InjectionsAlexander Camuto, Matthew Willetts, Umut Simsekli, Stephen J. Roberts 等NeurIPS 2020 · 被引用 90 次
相关 Paper
- Meta-Learners for Partially-Identified Treatment Effects Across Multiple EnvironmentsJonas Schweisthal, Dennis Frauen, Mihaela van der Schaar, Stefan FeuerriegelICML 2024 · 被引用 10 次
- Comparison of meta-learners for estimating multi-valued treatment heterogeneous effectsNaoufal Acharki, Ramiro Lugo, Antoine Bertoncello, Josselin GarnierICML 2023 · 被引用 18 次
- Model-agnostic meta-learners for estimating heterogeneous treatment effects over timeDennis Frauen, Konstantin Hess, Stefan FeuerriegelICLR 2025
- Conformal Meta-learners for Predictive Inference of Individual Treatment EffectsAhmed M. Alaa, Zaid Ahmad, Mark J. van der LaanNeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 32 次
- Unveiling the Potential of Robustness in Selecting Conditional Average Treatment Effect EstimatorsYiyan Huang, Cheuk Hang Leung, Siyi Wang, Yijun Li 等NeurIPS 2024 · 被引用 2 次
