DOLMA: Securing Speculation with the Principle of Transient Non-Observability
Kevin Loughlin, Ian Neal, Jiacheng Ma, Elisa Tsai, Ofir Weisse, Satish Narayanasamy, Baris Kasikci
摘要
Modern processors allow attackers to leak data during transient (i.e., mis-speculated) execution through microarchitectural covert timing channels. While initial defenses were channel-specific, recent solutions employ speculative information flow control in an attempt to automatically mitigate attacks via any channel. However, we demonstrate that the current state-of-the-art defense fails to mitigate attacks using speculative stores, still allowing arbitrary data leakage during transient execution. Furthermore, we show that the state of the art does not scale to protect data in registers, incurring 30.8-63.4% overhead on SPEC 2017, depending on the threat model. We then present DOLMA, the first defense to automatically provide comprehensive protection against all known transient execution attacks. DOLMA combines a lightweight speculative information flow control scheme with a set of secure performance optimizations. By enforcing a novel principle of transient non-observability, DOLMA ensures that a time slice on a core provides a unit of isolation in the context of existing attacks. Accordingly, DOLMA can allow speculative TLB/L1 cache accesses and variable-time arithmetic without loss of security. On SPEC 2017, DOLMA achieves comprehensive protection of data in memory at 10.2-29.7% overhead, adding protection for data in registers at 22.6-42.2% overhead (8.2-21.2% less than the state of the art, with greater security).
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper37
- PACMAN: attacking ARM pointer authentication with speculative executionJoseph Ravichandran, Weon Taek Na, Jay Lang, Mengjia YanISCA 2022 · 被引用 68 次
- I See Dead µops: Leaking Secrets via Intel/AMD Micro-Op CachesXida Ren, Logan Moody, Mohammadkazem Taram, Matthew Jordan 等ISCA 2021 · 被引用 59 次
- SoK: Practical Foundations for Software Spectre DefensesSunjay Cauligi, Craig Disselkoen, Daniel Moghimi, Gilles Barthe 等S&P 2022 · 被引用 59 次
- GhostMinion: A Strictness-Ordered Cache System for Spectre MitigationSam AinsworthMICRO 2021 · 被引用 36 次
- Speculative Privacy Tracking (SPT): Leaking Information From Speculative Execution Without Compromising PrivacyRutvik Choudhary, Jiyong Yu, Christopher W. Fletcher, Adam MorrisonMICRO 2021 · 被引用 33 次
它引用的顶会 Paper24
- Spectre Attacks: Exploiting Speculative ExecutionPaul Kocher, Jann Horn, Anders Fogh, Daniel Genkin 等S&P 2019 · 被引用 2,435 次
- Meltdown: Reading Kernel Memory from User SpaceMoritz Lipp, Michael Schwarz, Daniel Gruss, Thomas Prescher 等USENIX Security 2018 · 被引用 1,456 次
- Foreshadow: Extracting the Keys to the Intel SGX Kingdom with Transient Out-of-Order ExecutionJo Van Bulck, Marina Minkin, Ofir Weisse, Daniel Genkin 等USENIX Security 2018 · 被引用 1,175 次
- ZombieLoad: Cross-Privilege-Boundary Data SamplingMichael Schwarz, Moritz Lipp, Daniel Moghimi, Jo Van Bulck 等CCS 2019 · 被引用 464 次
- A Systematic Evaluation of Transient Execution Attacks and DefensesClaudio Canella, Jo Van Bulck, Michael Schwarz, Moritz Lipp 等USENIX Security 2019 · 被引用 442 次
相关 Paper
- Speculative Data-Oblivious Execution: Mobilizing Safe Prediction For Safe and Efficient Speculative ExecutionJiyong Yu, Namrata Mantri, Josep Torrellas, Adam Morrison 等ISCA 2020 · 被引用 50 次
- ConTExT: A Generic Approach for Mitigating SpectreMichael Schwarz, Moritz Lipp, Claudio Canella, Robert Schilling 等NDSS 2020
- Levioso: Efficient Compiler-Informed Secure SpeculationAli Hajiabadi, Archit Agarwal, Andreas Diavastos, Trevor E. CarlsonDAC 2024 · 被引用 1 次
- Exploiting Hidden Resource Contention in Selective Speculation DefensesXiaoyu Cheng, Fei Tong, Zhenyu Lei, Fang Jiang 等USENIX Security 2026
- dfence: Fine-Grained Speculation Barriers for Efficient and Effective Hardware-Software Protection in the Spectre EraDavide Davoli, Marton Bognar, Lesly-Ann Daniel, Benjamin Gregoire 等CCS 2026 · 被引用 1 次
