Constructing Interpretable Features from Compositional Neuron Groups
Or David Shafran, Atticus Geiger, Mor Geva
摘要
A central goal for mechanistic interpretability has been to identify the right units of analysis in large language models (LLMs) that causally explain their outputs. While early work focused on individual neurons, evidence that neurons often encode multiple concepts has motivated a shift toward analyzing directions in activation space. A key question is how to find directions that capture interpretable features in an unsupervised manner. Current methods rely on dictionary learning with sparse autoencoders (SAEs), commonly trained over residual stream activations to learn directions from scratch. However, SAEs often struggle in causal evaluations and lack intrinsic interpretability, as their learning is not explicitly tied to the computations of the model. Here, we tackle these limitations by directly decomposing MLP activations with semi-nonnegative matrix factorization (SNMF), such that the learned features are (a) sparse linear combinations of co-activated neurons, and (b) mapped to their activating inputs, making them directly interpretable. Experiments on Llama 3.1, Gemma 2 and GPT-2 show that SNMF derived features outperform SAEs and a strong supervised baseline (difference-in-means) on causal steering, while aligning with human-interpretable concepts. Further analysis reveals that specific neuron combinations are reused across semantically-related features, exposing a hierarchical structure in the MLP's activation space. Together, these results position SNMF as a simple and effective tool for identifying interpretable features and dissecting concept representations in LLMs.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
它引用的顶会 Paper20
- Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language ModelsRobert Huben, Hoagy Cunningham, Logan Riggs Smith, Aidan Ewart 等ICLR 2024 · 被引用 1,072 次
- Pay Attention to MLPsHanxiao Liu, Zihang Dai, David R. So, Quoc V. LeNeurIPS 2021 · 被引用 912 次
- The Linear Representation Hypothesis and the Geometry of Large Language ModelsKiho Park, Yo Joong Choe, Victor VeitchICML 2024 · 被引用 461 次
- Compositional Explanations of NeuronsJesse Mu, Jacob AndreasNeurIPS 2020 · 被引用 229 次
- A is for Absorption: Studying Feature Splitting and Absorption in Sparse AutoencodersDavid Chanin, James Wilken-Smith, Tomás Dulka, Hardik Bhatnagar 等NeurIPS 2025 · 被引用 168 次
相关 Paper
- From Directions to Regions: Decomposing Activations in Language Models via Local GeometryOr Shafran, Shaked Ronen, Omri Fahn, Shauli Ravfogel 等ICML 2026 · 被引用 7 次
- Revising and Falsifying Sparse Autoencoder Feature ExplanationsGeorge Ma, Samuel Pfrommer, Somayeh SojoudiNeurIPS 2025 · 被引用 7 次
- Sparse Autoencoders Trained on the Same Data Learn Different FeaturesGonçalo Paulo, Nora BelroseICLR 2026 · 被引用 96 次
- Route Sparse Autoencoder to Interpret Large Language ModelsWei Shi, Sihang Li, Tao Liang, Mingyang Wan 等EMNLP 2025 · 被引用 1 次
- Scaling Sparse Feature Circuits For Studying In-Context LearningDmitrii Kharlapenko, Stepan Shabalin, Arthur Conmy, Neel NandaICML 2025
