The AI Gap: How Socioeconomic Status Affects Language Technology Interactions
Elisa Bassignana, Amanda Cercas Curry, Dirk Hovy
摘要
Socioeconomic status (SES) fundamentally influences how people interact with each other and more recently, with digital technologies like Large Language Models (LLMs). While previous research has highlighted the interaction between SES and language technology, it was limited by reliance on proxy metrics and synthetic data. We survey 1,000 individuals from diverse socioeconomic backgrounds about their use of language technologies and generative AI, and collect 6,482 prompts from their previous interactions with LLMs. We find systematic differences across SES groups in language technology usage (i.e., frequency, performed tasks), interaction styles, and topics. Higher SES entails a higher level of abstraction, convey requests more concisely, and topics like 'inclusivity' and 'travel'. Lower SES correlates with higher anthropomorphization of LLMs (using "hello" and "thank you") and more concrete language. Our findings suggest that while generative language technologies are becoming more accessible to everyone, socioeconomic linguistic differences still stratify their use to exacerbate the digital divide. These differences underscore the importance of considering SES in developing language technologies to accommodate varying linguistic needs rooted in socioeconomic factors and limit the AI Gap across SES groups. 3 ShareGPT Datasets 4 There are different social stratification systems depending on the culture of reference (e.g., the Indian caste system, Indigenous American clans, or tribes). Our study focuses on U.S. and U.K. speakers, so we refer to the Western European class model. For a broader discussion on the intricacies of social stratification systems, see (Savage and Mouncey, 2016) . websites relevant to a given query. (Lent et al., 2022) 7 https://streamlit.io/
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper2
- Lost in Simulation: LLM-Simulated Users are Unreliable Proxies for Human Users in Agentic EvaluationsPreethi Seshadri, Samuel Cahyawijaya, Ayomide Odumakinde, Sameer Singh 等ACL 2026 · 被引用 19 次
- One Persona, Many Cues, Different Results: How Sociodemographic Cues Impact LLM PersonalizationFranziska Weeber, Vera Neplenbroek, Jan Batzner, Sebastian PadóACL 2026 · 被引用 4 次
它引用的顶会 Paper5
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou 等ICLR 2021 · 被引用 7,905 次
- WildChat: 1M ChatGPT Interaction Logs in the WildWenting Zhao, Xiang Ren, Jack Hessel, Claire Cardie 等ICLR 2024 · 被引用 504 次
- LMSYS-Chat-1M: A Large-Scale Real-World LLM Conversation DatasetLianmin Zheng, Wei-Lin Chiang, Ying Sheng, Tianle Li 等ICLR 2024 · 被引用 419 次
- Mirages. On Anthropomorphism in Dialogue SystemsGavin Abercrombie, Amanda Cercas Curry, Tanvi Dinkar, Verena Rieser 等EMNLP 2023 · 被引用 44 次
- Classist Tools: Social Class Correlates with Performance in NLPAmanda Cercas Curry, Giuseppe Attanasio, Zeerak Talat, Dirk HovyACL 2024 · 被引用 1 次
相关 Paper
- Do LLM Agents Mirror Socio-Cognitive Effects in Power-Asymmetric Conversations?Anvesh Rao Vijjini, Sagar Manjunath, Snigdha ChaturvediACL 2026
- 'Rich Dad, Poor Lad': How do Large Language Models Contextualize Socioeconomic Factors in College Admission ?Huy Nghiem, Phuong-Anh Nguyen-Le, John Prindle, Rachel Rudinger 等EMNLP 2025 · 被引用 1 次
- An Empirical Analysis of the Writing Styles of Persona-Assigned LLMsManuj Malik, Jing Jiang, Kian Ming A. ChaiEMNLP 2024 · 被引用 2 次
- Large Language Models Develop Novel Social Biases Through Adaptive ExplorationAddison J. Wu, Ryan Liu, Xuechunzi Bai, Thomas GriffithsICML 2026 · 被引用 4 次
- HumT DumT: Measuring and controlling human-like language in LLMsMyra Cheng, Sunny Yu, Dan JurafskyACL 2025
