Probabilistic Permutation Graph Search: Black-Box Optimization for Fairness in Ranking
Ali Vardasbi, Fatemeh Sarvi, Maarten de Rijke
摘要
There are several measures for fairness in ranking, based on different underlying assumptions and perspectives. Plackett-Luce (PL) optimization with the REINFORCE algorithm can be used for optimizing black-box objective functions over permutations. In particular, it can be used for optimizing fairness measures. However, though effective for queries with a moderate number of repeating sessions, PL optimization has room for improvement for queries with a small number of repeating sessions.
In this paper, we present a novel way of representing permutation distributions, based on the notion of permutation graphs. Similar to PL, our distribution representation, called probabilistic permutation graph (PPG), can be used for black-box optimization of fairness. Different from PL, where pointwise logits are used as the distribution parameters, in PPG pairwise inversion probabilities together with a reference permutation construct the distribution. As such, the reference permutation can be set to the best sampled permutation regarding the objective function, making PPG suitable for both deterministic and stochastic rankings. Our experiments show that PPG, while comparable to PL for larger session repetitions (i.e., stochastic ranking), improves over PL for optimizing fairness metrics for queries with one session (i.e., deterministic ranking). Additionally, when accurate utility estimations are available, e.g., in tabular models, the performance of PPG in fairness optimization is significantly boosted compared to lower quality utility estimations from a learning to rank model, leading to a large performance gap with PL. Finally, the pairwise probabilities make it possible to impose pairwise constraints such as "item 𝑑 1 should always be ranked higher than item 𝑑 2 ." Such constraints can be used to simultaneously optimize the fairness metric and control another objective such as ranking performance.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper3
- Fairness of Exposure in Light of Incomplete Exposure EstimationMaria Heuss, Fatemeh Sarvi, Maarten de RijkeSIGIR 2022 · 被引用 21 次
- On the Impact of Outlier Bias on User ClicksFatemeh Sarvi, Ali Vardasbi, Mohammad Aliannejadi, Sebastian Schelter 等SIGIR 2023 · 被引用 6 次
- The Impact of Group Membership Bias on the Quality and Fairness of Exposure in RankingAli Vardasbi, Maarten de Rijke, Fernando Diaz, Mostafa DehghaniSIGIR 2024 · 被引用 2 次
它引用的顶会 Paper7
- Controlling Fairness and Bias in Dynamic Learning-to-RankMarco Morik, Ashudeep Singh, Jessica Hong, Thorsten JoachimsSIGIR 2020 · 被引用 205 次
- Computationally Efficient Optimization of Plackett-Luce Ranking Models for Relevance and FairnessHarrie OosterhuisSIGIR 2021 · 被引用 68 次
- Estimation of Fair Ranking Metrics with Incomplete JudgmentsÖmer Kirnap, Fernando Diaz, Asia Biega, Michael D. Ekstrand 等WWW 2021 · 被引用 40 次
- Policy-Gradient Training of Fair and Unbiased Ranking FunctionsHimank Yadav, Zhengxiao Du, Thorsten JoachimsSIGIR 2021 · 被引用 34 次
- Robust Generalization and Safe Query-Specializationin Counterfactual Learning to RankHarrie Oosterhuis, Maarten de RijkeWWW 2021 · 被引用 22 次
相关 Paper
- Optimizing Learning-to-Rank Models for Ex-Post Fair RelevanceSruthi Gorantla, Eshaan Bhansali, Amit Deshpande, Anand LouisSIGIR 2024 · 被引用 1 次
- Querywise Fair Learning to Rank through Multi-Objective OptimizationDebabrata Mahapatra, Chaosheng Dong, Michinari MommaKDD 2023 · 被引用 5 次
- Two-sided fairness in rankings via Lorenz dominanceVirginie Do, Sam Corbett-Davies, Jamal Atif, Nicolas UsunierNeurIPS 2021 · 被引用 64 次
- Pairwise Fairness for Ranking and RegressionHarikrishna Narasimhan, Andrew Cotter, Maya R. Gupta, Serena Lutong WangAAAI 2020 · 被引用 125 次
- Low-Variance Black-Box Gradient Estimates for the Plackett-Luce DistributionArtyom Gadetsky, Kirill Struminsky, Christopher Robinson, Novi Quadrianto 等AAAI 2020 · 被引用 11 次
