An LLM Agentic Approach for Legal-Critical Software: A Case Study for Tax Prep Software
Sina Gogani Khiabani, Ashutosh Trivedi, Diptikalyan Saha, Saeid Tizpaz-Niari
摘要
As Large Language Models (LLMs) continue to advance in their ability to process both natural and programming languages, they show promise for translation tasks in domains with strict compliance requirements. Yet ensuring consistency in legally critical settings remains challenging due to inherent limitations such as natural language ambiguity and the tendency to hallucinate. This paper explores an agentic approach that leverages LLMs for the development of legal-critical software. We use U.S. federal tax software as a representative case study, where natural language tax code must be translated precisely into executable logic.
A central challenge in developing legal-critical software from specifications lies in test case generation, which suffers from the oracle problem: determining the correct output for a given scenario often requires interpreting legal statutes. Prior work has proposed metamorphic testing as a solution by evaluating equivalence across similarly situated individuals. A key innovation of our work is a higher-order generalization of metamorphic tests, motivated by our tax preparation case study, in which system outputs are compared across structured shifts among similar individuals. Since manually generating such higher-order relations is tedious and error-prone, our agentic paradigm is well suited to automate test case generation.
We design and implement Synedrion, an assembly of LLMbased agents simulating roles in real-world software development teams handling legal documents. The framework includes a metamorphic testing agent that produces counterexamples while translating tax code into executable software. Our findings indicate that Synedrion, when employing smaller language models (e.g., GPT-4o-mini), can outperform frontier models (e.g., GPT-4o and Claude-3.5) in complex tax code generation tasks, achieving a worst-case pass rate of 45% compared with 9%-15%. We thus make the case for LLM-driven agentic methodologies as a pathway for generating robust, trustworthy legal-critical software from natural language specifications.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper1
问问它们各自怎么用它它引用的顶会 Paper7
- Reflexion: language agents with verbal reinforcement learningNoah Shinn, Federico Cassano, Ashwin Gopinath, Karthik Narasimhan 等NeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 5,828 次
- Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-FeedbackAman Madaan, Niket Tandon, Prakhar Gupta, Skyler Hallinan 等NeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 4,972 次
- CodeChain: Towards Modular Code Generation Through Chain of Self-revisions with Representative Sub-modulesHung Le, Hailin Chen, Amrita Saha, Akash Gokul 等ICLR 2024 · 被引用 73 次
- CodePlan: Repository-Level Coding using LLMs and PlanningRamakrishna Bairi, Atharv Sonwane, Aditya Kanade, Vageesh D. C. 等FSE 2024 · 被引用 67 次
- MapCoder: Multi-Agent Code Generation for Competitive Problem SolvingMd. Ashraful Islam, Mohammed Eunus Ali, Md. Rizwan ParvezACL 2024 · 被引用 29 次
相关 Paper
- LLM4Fin: Fully Automating LLM-Powered Test Case Generation for FinTech Software Acceptance TestingZhiyi Xue, Liangguo Li, Senyue Tian, Xiaohong Chen 等ISSTA 2024 · 被引用 19 次
- Compiling Large Multi-modal Requirement Documents into Runnable Software Systems: From an Agentic Test-Driven PerspectiveWeiyu Kong, Yun Lin, Xiwen Teoh, Duc-Minh Nguyen 等ISSTA 2026 · 被引用 1 次
- MatchFixAgent: Language-Agnostic Autonomous Repository-Level Code Translation Validation and RepairAli Reza Ibrahimzada, Brandon Paulsen, Reyhaneh Jabbarvand, Joey Dodds 等ICML 2026 · 被引用 9 次
- ChatDev: Communicative Agents for Software DevelopmentChen Qian, Wei Liu, Hongzhang Liu, Nuo Chen 等ACL 2024
- An Agentic Framework with LLMs for Solving Complex Vehicle Routing ProblemsNi Zhang, Zhiguang Cao, Jianan Zhou, Cong Zhang 等ICLR 2026 · 被引用 8 次
