Lune

SODA2026顶会

Sublinear-Time Lower Bounds for Approximating Matching Size using Non-Adaptive Queries

Vihan Shah

2026年份

摘要

We study the problem of estimating the size of the maximum matching in the sublinear-time setting. This problem has been extensively studied, with several known upper and lower bounds. A notable result by Behnezhad (FOCS 2021) established a 2-approximation in O(n) time.

However, all known upper and lower bounds are in the adaptive query model, where each query can depend on previous answers. In contrast, non-adaptive query models-where the distribution over all queries must be fixed in advance-are widely studied in property testing, often revealing fundamental gaps between adaptive and non-adaptive complexities. This raises the natural question: is adaptivity also necessary for approximating the maximum matching size in sublinear time? This motivates the goal of achieving a constant or even a polylogarithmic approximation using O(n) non-adaptive adjacency list queries, similar to what was done by Behnezhad using adaptive queries.

We show that this is not possible by proving that any randomized non-adaptive algorithm achieving an n 1/3-γ -approximation, for any constant γ > 0, with probability at least 2/3, must make Ω(n 1+ε ) adjacency list queries, for some constant ε > 0 depending on γ. This result highlights the necessity of adaptivity in achieving strong approximations. However, non-trivial upper bounds are still achievable: we present a simple randomized algorithm that achieves an n 1/2 -approximation in O(n log 2 n) queries.

Moreover, our lower bound also extends to the newly defined variant of the non-adaptive model, where queries are issued according to a fixed query tree, introduced by Azarmehr, Behnezhad, Ghafari, and Sudan (FOCS 2025) in the context of Local Computation Algorithms.

问问这篇 Paper

智能体会读完全文。

Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。

可以从这些问题问起

智能体调用

Luneget_paper_fulltext

在 Lune 里问

免费开始,无需绑卡

它引用的顶会 Paper23

相关 Paper

黄昏的海面,两侧是细线勾勒的悬崖