Constrained Belief Updates Explain Geometric Structures in Transformer Representations
Mateusz Piotrowski, Paul M. Riechers, Daniel Filan, Adam S. Shai
摘要
What computational structures emerge in transformers trained on next-token prediction? In this work, we provide evidence that transformers implement constrained Bayesian belief updating-a parallelized version of partial Bayesian inference shaped by architectural constraints. We integrate the model-agnostic theory of optimal prediction with mechanistic interpretability to analyze transformers trained on a tractable family of hidden Markov models that generate rich geometric patterns in neural activations. Our primary analysis focuses on single-layer transformers, revealing how the first attention layer implements these constrained updates, with extensions to multi-layer architectures demonstrating how subsequent layers refine these representations. We find that attention carries out an algorithm with a natural interpretation in the probability simplex, and create representations with distinctive geometric structure. We show how both the algorithmic behavior and the underlying geometry of these representations can be theoretically predicted in detail-including the attention pattern, OV-vectors, and embedding vectors-by modifying the equations for optimal future token predictions to account for the architectural constraints of attention. Our approach provides a principled lens on how architectural constraints shape the implementation of optimal prediction, revealing why transformers develop specific intermediate geometric structures.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper2
- Transformers learn factored representationsAdam Shai, Loren Amdahl-Culleton, Casper Christensen, Henry R Bigelow 等ICML 2026 · 被引用 2 次
- Gradient Smoothing: Coupling Layer-wise Updates for Improved OptimizationHaoming Meng, Anton Sugolov, Vardan PapyanICML 2026
它引用的顶会 Paper6
- Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language ModelsRobert Huben, Hoagy Cunningham, Logan Riggs Smith, Aidan Ewart 等ICLR 2024 · 被引用 1,072 次
- Towards Automated Circuit Discovery for Mechanistic InterpretabilityArthur Conmy, Augustine N. Mavor-Parker, Aengus Lynch, Stefan Heimersheim 等NeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 861 次
- The Linear Representation Hypothesis and the Geometry of Large Language ModelsKiho Park, Yo Joong Choe, Victor VeitchICML 2024 · 被引用 461 次
- Progress measures for grokking via mechanistic interpretabilityNeel Nanda, Lawrence Chan, Tom Lieberum, Jess Smith 等ICLR 2023 · 被引用 54 次
- Interpretability in the Wild: a Circuit for Indirect Object Identification in GPT-2 SmallKevin Ro Wang, Alexandre Variengien, Arthur Conmy, Buck Shlegeris 等ICLR 2023 · 被引用 50 次
相关 Paper
- Transformers Represent Belief State Geometry in their Residual StreamAdam S. Shai, Lucas Teixeira, Alexander Gietelink Oldenziel, Sarah Marzen 等NeurIPS 2024 · 被引用 83 次
- Attention as Implicit Structural InferenceRyan Singh, Christopher L. BuckleyNeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 12 次
- How Transformers Learn Causal Structures In-Context: Explainable Mechanism Meets Theoretical GuaranteeJianzhe Wei, Siyu Chen, Jianliang He, Zhuoran YangICLR 2026
- Causal Interpretation of Self-Attention in Pre-Trained TransformersRaanan Y. Rohekar, Yaniv Gurwicz, Shami NisimovNeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 62 次
- How Transformers Represent Hierarchies: A Local-to-Global MechanismZhiling Zhou, Tianhao Wang, Zhuoran YangICML 2026
