Mitigating Translationese Bias in Multilingual LLM-as-a-Judge via Disentangled Information Bottleneck

Large language models (LLMs) have become a standard for multilingual evaluation, yet they exhibit a severe systematic "translationese bias". In this paper, "translationese bias" is characterized as LLMs systematically favoring machine-translated text over human-authored references, particularly in low-resource languages. We attribute this bias to spurious correlations with (i) latent manifold alignment with English and (ii) cross-lingual predictability. To mitigate this bias, we propose DIB-JUDGE, a robust fine-tuning framework that learns a minimally sufficient, judgment-critical representation via variational information compression, while explicitly isolating spurious factors into the dedicated bias branch. Furthermore, we incorporate a cross-covariance penalty that explicitly suppresses statistical dependence between robust and bias representations, thereby encouraging effective disentanglement. Extensive evaluations on multilingual reward modeling benchmarks and a dedicated translationese bias evaluation suite demonstrate that the proposed DIBJUDGE consistently outperforms strong baselines and substantially mitigates translationese bias.