Lune

CCS2024顶会

Dye4AI: Assuring Data Boundary on Generative AI Services

Shu Wang, Kun Sun, Yan Zhai

摘要

Generative artificial intelligence (AI) is versatile for various applications, but security and privacy concerns with third-party AI vendors hinder its broader adoption in sensitive scenarios. Hence, it is essential for users to validate the AI trustworthiness and ensure the security of data boundaries. In this paper, we present a dye testing system named Dye4AI, which injects crafted trigger data into human-AI dialogue and observes AI responses towards specific prompts to diagnose data flow in AI model evolution. Our dye testing procedure contains 3 stages: trigger generation, trigger insertion, and trigger retrieval. First, to retain both uniqueness and stealthiness, we design a new trigger that transforms a pseudo-random number to a intelligible format. Second, with a custom-designed three-step conversation strategy, we insert each trigger item into dialogue and confirm the model memorizes the new trigger knowledge in the current session. Finally, we routinely try to recover triggers with specific prompts in new sessions, as triggers can present in new sessions only if AI vendors leverage user data for model fine-tuning. Extensive experiments on six LLMs demonstrate our dye testing scheme is effective in ensuring the data boundary, even for models with various architectures and parameter sizes. Also, larger and premier models tend to be more suitable for Dye4AI, e.g., trigger can be retrieved in OpenLLaMa-13B even with only 2 insertions per trigger item. Moreover, we analyze the prompt selection in dye testing, providing insights for future testing systems on generative AI services. CCS Concepts • Security and privacy → Security services.

问 Lune

尽管问,回答会引用原文。

Lune 会读完全文和相关的 Paper,每个回答都附上所依据的原文段落。

可以从这些问题问起

Lune 的依据

全文 · 相关的 Paper

获取答案

免费开始,无需绑卡

它引用的 Paper30

  1. LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu 等ICLR 2022 · 18,833 次引用
  2. FlashAttention: Fast and Memory-Efficient Exact Attention with IO-AwarenessTri Dao, Daniel Y. Fu, Stefano Ermon, Atri Rudra 等NeurIPS 2022 · 5,493 次引用
  3. Extracting Training Data from Large Language ModelsNicholas Carlini, Florian Tramèr, Eric Wallace, Matthew Jagielski 等USENIX Security 2021 · 2,866 次引用
  4. Neural Cleanse: Identifying and Mitigating Backdoor Attacks in Neural NetworksBolun Wang, Yuanshun Yao, Shawn Shan, Huiying Li 等S&P 2019 · 1,801 次引用
  5. Manipulating Machine Learning: Poisoning Attacks and Countermeasures for Regression LearningMatthew Jagielski, Alina Oprea, Battista Biggio, Chang Liu 等S&P 2018 · 867 次引用

相关 Paper

  1. TrojLLM: A Black-box Trojan Prompt Attack on Large Language ModelsJiaqi Xue, Mengxin Zheng, Ting Hua, Yilin Shen 等NeurIPS 2023 · 63 次引用
  2. On the Evaluation of Large Language Models in Unit Test GenerationLin Yang, Chen Yang, Shutao Gao, Weijing Wang 等ASE 2024 · 42 次引用
  3. Towards Reliable Verification of Unauthorized Data Usage in Personalized Text-to-Image Diffusion ModelsBoheng Li, Yanhao Wei, Yankai Fu, Zhenting Wang 等S&P 2025
  4. Fun-tuning: Characterizing the Vulnerability of Proprietary LLMs to Optimization-Based Prompt Injection Attacks via the Fine-Tuning InterfaceAndrey Labunets, Nishit V. Pandya, Ashish Hooda, Xiaohan Fu 等S&P 2025
  5. Be Careful When Fine-tuning On Open-Source LLMs: Your Fine-tuning Data Could Be Secretly Stolen!Zhexin Zhang, Yuhao Sun, Junxiao Yang, Shiyao Cui 等ICLR 2026 · 5 次引用
黄昏的海面,两侧是细线勾勒的悬崖