A Calculus for Computing Structured Justifications for Election Outcomes
Arthur Boixel, Ulle Endriss, Ronald de Haan
2022年份
17被引次数
2顶会引用
摘要
In the context of social choice theory, we develop a tableaubased calculus for reasoning about voting rules. This calculus can be used to obtain structured explanations for why a given set of axioms justifies a given election outcome for a given profile of voter preferences. We then show how to operationalise this calculus, using a combination of SAT solving and Answer Set Programming, to arrive at a flexible framework for presenting human-readable justifications to users.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper2
- Explainable and Efficient Randomized Voting RulesSoroush Ebadian, Aris Filos-Ratsikas, Mohamad Latifian, Nisarg ShahNeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 10 次
- Explaining Tournament Solutions with Minimal SupportsClément Contet, Umberto Grandi, Jérôme MenginAAAI 2026
它引用的顶会 Paper2
相关 Paper
- Using MaxSAT for Efficient Explanations of Tree EnsemblesAlexey Ignatiev, Yacine Izza, Peter J. Stuckey, João Marques-SilvaAAAI 2022 · 被引用 75 次
- Computing the Why-Provenance for Datalog Queries via SAT SolversMarco Calautti, Ester Livshits, Andreas Pieris, Markus SchneiderAAAI 2024 · 被引用 4 次
- Proportionality in Approval-Based Participatory BudgetingMarkus Brill, Stefan Forster, Martin Lackner, Jan Maly 等AAAI 2023 · 被引用 34 次
- On the Edge of Core (Non-)Emptiness: An Automated Reasoning Approach to Approval-Based Multi-Winner VotingRatip Emin Berker, Emanuel Tewolde, Vincent Conitzer, Mingyu Guo 等AAAI 2026 · 被引用 4 次
- The Complexity of Learning Approval-Based Multiwinner Voting RulesIoannis Caragiannis, Karl FehrsAAAI 2022 · 被引用 6 次
