Measuring Uncertainty Calibration
Kamil Ciosek, Nicolò Felicioni, Sina Ghiassian, Juan Elenter Litwin, Francesco Tonolini, David Gustaffson, Eva Garcia Martin, Carmen Gonzalez, Raphaëlle Bertrand-Lalo
摘要
We make two contributions to the problem of estimating the calibration error of a binary classifier from a finite dataset. First, we provide an upper bound for any classifier where the calibration function has bounded variation. Second, we provide a method of modifying any classifier so that its calibration error can be upper bounded efficiently without significantly impacting classifier performance and without any restrictive assumptions. All our results are non-asymptotic and distribution-free. We conclude by providing advice on how to measure calibration error in practice. Our methods yield practical procedures that can be run on real-world datasets with modest overhead.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
它引用的顶会 Paper2
相关 Paper
- PAC-Bayes Analysis for Recalibration in ClassificationMasahiro Fujisawa, Futoshi FutamiICML 2025
- Practical estimation of the optimal classification error with soft labels and calibrationRyota Ushio, Takashi Ishida, Masashi SugiyamaICLR 2026 · 被引用 6 次
- LaSCal: Label-Shift Calibration without target labelsTeodora Popordanoska, Gorjan Radevski, Tinne Tuytelaars, Matthew B. BlaschkoNeurIPS 2024 · 被引用 12 次
- (Almost) Provable Error Bounds Under Distribution Shift via Disagreement DiscrepancyElan Rosenfeld, Saurabh GargNeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 18 次
- A Consistent and Differentiable Lp Canonical Calibration Error EstimatorTeodora Popordanoska, Raphael Sayer, Matthew B. BlaschkoNeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 58 次
