K-HALU: Multiple Answer Korean Hallucination Benchmark for Large Language Models
Jaehyung Seo, Heuiseok Lim
摘要
Recent researchers and companies have been developing large language models (LLMs) specifically designed for particular purposes and have achieved significant advancements in various natural language processing tasks. However, LLMs are still prone to generating hallucinations-results that are unfaithful or inconsistent with the given input. As a result, the need for datasets to evaluate and demonstrate the hallucination detection capabilities of LLMs is increasingly recognized. Nonetheless, the Korean NLP community lacks publicly available benchmark datasets demonstrating the faithfulness of knowledge-based information. Furthermore, the few existing datasets that evaluate hallucination are limited in their access to the entire dataset, restricting detailed analysis beyond simple scoring, and are based on translated English knowledge. To address these challenges, we introduce K-HALU 1 , a Korean benchmark designed to evaluate LLMs' hallucination detection in Korean. This benchmark contains seven domains, considering the faithfulness of statements based on knowledge documents compiled from Korean news, magazines, and books. For more strict evaluation, 40% of the dataset is structured as multiple-answer questions, requiring models to select all possible correct answers from the given options. Our empirical results show that opensource LLMs still struggle with hallucination detection in Korean knowledge, emphasizing the need for a more detailed analysis of their limitations.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
它引用的顶会 Paper21
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida 等NeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 24,707 次
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma 等NeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 22,562 次
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou 等ICLR 2021 · 被引用 7,905 次
- TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human FalsehoodsStephanie Lin, Jacob Hilton, Owain EvansACL 2022 · 被引用 3,228 次
- Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language ModelsXuezhi Wang, Jason Wei, Dale Schuurmans, Quoc V. Le 等ICLR 2023 · 被引用 681 次
相关 Paper
- The Dawn After the Dark: An Empirical Study on Factuality Hallucination in Large Language ModelsJunyi Li, Jie Chen, Ruiyang Ren, Xiaoxue Cheng 等ACL 2024 · 被引用 49 次
- How Much Do LLMs Hallucinate across Languages? On Realistic Multilingual Estimation of LLM HallucinationSaad Obaid ul Islam, Anne Lauscher, Goran GlavasEMNLP 2025
- CogniBench: A Legal-inspired Framework and Dataset for Assessing Cognitive Faithfulness of Large Language ModelsXiaqiang Tang, Jian Li, Keyu Hu, Nan Du 等ACL 2025 · 被引用 3 次
- Rethinking Evaluation for LLM Hallucination Detection: A Desiderata, A New RAG-based Benchmark, New InsightsWenbo Chen, Veena Padmanabhan, Tootiya Giyahchi, Elaine Wong 等ACL 2026 · 被引用 1 次
- Can Knowledge Editing Really Correct Hallucinations?Baixiang Huang, Canyu Chen, Xiongxiao Xu, Ali Payani 等ICLR 2025
