Plurals: A System for Guiding LLMs via Simulated Social Ensembles
Joshua Ashkinaze, Emily Fry, Narendra Edara, Eric Gilbert, Ceren Budak
摘要
Recent debates raised concerns that language models may favor certain viewpoints. But what if the solution is not to aim for a "view from nowhere" but rather to leverage different viewpoints? We introduce Plurals, a system and Python library for pluralistic AI deliberation. Plurals consists of Agents (LLMs, optionally with personas) which deliberate within customizable Structures, with Moderators overseeing deliberation. Plurals is a generator of simulated social ensembles. Plurals integrates with government datasets to create nationally representative personas, includes deliberation templates inspired by deliberative democracy, and allows users to customize both information-sharing structures and deliberation behavior within Structures. Six case studies demonstrate fidelity to theoretical constructs and efficacy. Three randomized experiments show simulated focus groups produced output resonant with an online sample of the relevant audiences (chosen over zero-shot generation in 75% of trials). Plurals is both a paradigm and a concrete system for pluralistic AI.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper5
- Deep Value Benchmark: Measuring Whether Models Generalize Deep Values or Shallow PreferencesJoshua Ashkinaze, Hua Shen, Sai Avula, Eric Gilbert 等NeurIPS 2025 · 被引用 7 次
- Just-In-Time Objectives: A General Approach for Specialized AI InteractionsMichelle S. Lam, Omar Shaikh, Hallie Xu, Alice Guo 等CHI 2026 · 被引用 3 次
- Agent-Supported Foresight for AI Systemic Risks: AI Agents for Breadth, Experts for JudgmentLeon Fröhling, Alessandro Giaconia, Edyta Paulina Bogucka, Daniele QuerciaCHI 2026 · 被引用 3 次
- Metric Distortion of Small-Group DeliberationAshish Goel, Mohak Goyal, Kamesh MunagalaSTOC 2025 · 被引用 1 次
- Synthetic Socratic Debates: Examining Persona Effects on Moral Decision and Persuasion DynamicsJiarui Liu, Yueqi Song, Yunze Xiao, Mingqian Zheng 等EMNLP 2025
它引用的顶会 Paper19
- ChatEval: Towards Better LLM-based Evaluators through Multi-Agent DebateChi-Min Chan, Weize Chen, Yusheng Su, Jianxuan Yu 等ICLR 2024 · 被引用 871 次
- Towards Understanding Sycophancy in Language ModelsMrinank Sharma, Meg Tong, Tomasz Korbak, David Duvenaud 等ICLR 2024 · 被引用 762 次
- Large Language Models Struggle to Learn Long-Tail KnowledgeNikhil Kandpal, Haikang Deng, Adam Roberts, Eric Wallace 等ICML 2023 · 被引用 623 次
- Chain of Agents: Large Language Models Collaborating on Long-Context TasksYusen Zhang, Ruoxi Sun, Yanfei Chen, Tomas Pfister 等NeurIPS 2024 · 被引用 297 次
- Debating with More Persuasive LLMs Leads to More Truthful AnswersAkbir Khan, John Hughes, Dan Valentine, Laura Ruis 等ICML 2024 · 被引用 244 次
相关 Paper
- PerSpectra: A Scalable and Configurable Pluralist Benchmark of Perspectives from ArgumentsShangrui Nie, Kian Omoomi, Lucie Flek, Zhixue Zhao 等ICLR 2026 · 被引用 3 次
- Should we be going MAD? A Look at Multi-Agent Debate Strategies for LLMsAndries P. Smit, Nathan Grinsztajn, Paul Duckworth, Thomas D. Barrett 等ICML 2024 · 被引用 82 次
- Multi-Agent-as-Judge: Aligning LLM-Agent-Based Automated Evaluation with Multi-Dimensional Human EvaluationJiaju Chen, Yuxuan Lu, Xiaojie Wang, Huimin Zeng 等ACL 2026 · 被引用 30 次
- Pluralistic Alignment for Healthcare: A Role-Driven FrameworkJiayou Zhong, Anudeex Shetty, Chao Jia, Xuanrui Lin 等EMNLP 2025 · 被引用 1 次
- Evaluating Language Model Pluralism through In-the-wild Crowd DiscussionsGagan Mundada, Rohan Surana, Nandhini Swaminathan, Bodhisattwa Prasad Majumder 等ACL 2026
