Driller: Augmenting Fuzzing Through Selective Symbolic Execution
Nick Stephens, John Grosen, Christopher Salls, Andrew Dutcher, Ruoyu Wang, Jacopo Corbetta, Yan Shoshitaishvili, Christopher Kruegel, Giovanni Vigna
摘要
Memory corruption vulnerabilities are an everpresent risk in software, which attackers can exploit to obtain unauthorized access to confidential information. As products with access to sensitive data are becoming more prevalent, the number of potentially exploitable systems is also increasing, resulting in a greater need for automated software vetting tools. DARPA recently funded a competition, with millions of dollars in prize money, to further research focusing on automated vulnerability finding and patching, showing the importance of research in this area. Current techniques for finding potential bugs include static, dynamic, and concolic analysis systems, which each having their own advantages and disadvantages. A common limitation of systems designed to create inputs which trigger vulnerabilities is that they only find shallow bugs and struggle to exercise deeper paths in executables. We present Driller, a hybrid vulnerability excavation tool which leverages fuzzing and selective concolic execution in a complementary manner, to find deeper bugs. Inexpensive fuzzing is used to exercise compartments of an application, while concolic execution is used to generate inputs which satisfy the complex checks separating the compartments. By combining the strengths of the two techniques, we mitigate their weaknesses, avoiding the path explosion inherent in concolic analysis and the incompleteness of fuzzing. Driller uses selective concolic execution to explore only the paths deemed interesting by the fuzzer and to generate inputs for conditions that the fuzzer cannot satisfy. We evaluate Driller on 126 applications released in the qualifying event of the DARPA Cyber Grand Challenge and show its efficacy by identifying the same number of vulnerabilities, in the same time, as the top-scoring team of the qualifying event. Permission to freely reproduce all or part of this paper for noncommercial purposes is granted provided that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Reproduction for commercial purposes is strictly prohibited without the prior written consent of the Internet Society, the first-named author (for reproduction of an entire paper only), and the author's employer if the paper was prepared within the scope of employment.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper226
- SOK: (State of) The Art of War: Offensive Techniques in Binary AnalysisYan Shoshitaishvili, Ruoyu Wang, Christopher Salls, Nick Stephens 等S&P 2016 · 被引用 1,085 次
- Coverage-based Greybox Fuzzing as Markov ChainMarcel Böhme, Van-Thuan Pham, Abhik RoychoudhuryCCS 2016 · 被引用 1,026 次
- Directed Greybox FuzzingMarcel Böhme, Van-Thuan Pham, Manh-Dung Nguyen, Abhik RoychoudhuryCCS 2017 · 被引用 836 次
- Evaluating Fuzz TestingGeorge Klees, Andrew Ruef, Benji Cooper, Shiyi Wei 等CCS 2018 · 被引用 753 次
- VUzzer: Application-aware Evolutionary FuzzingSanjay Rawat, Vivek Jain, Ashish Kumar, Lucian Cojocar 等NDSS 2017 · 被引用 700 次
相关 Paper
- Send Hardest Problems My Way: Probabilistic Path Prioritization for Hybrid FuzzingLei Zhao, Yue Duan, Heng Yin, Jifeng XuanNDSS 2019 · 被引用 157 次
- SAVIOR: Towards Bug-Driven Hybrid TestingYaohui Chen, Peng Li, Jun Xu, Shengjian Guo 等S&P 2020 · 被引用 186 次
- Efficient Directed Hybrid Fuzzing via Target-Centric Seed Selection and GenerationZhen Li, Shenghan Liu, Qiuping Yi, Pengbo Du 等OOPSLA 2026
- AntiFuzz: Impeding Fuzzing Audits of Binary ExecutablesEmre Güler, Cornelius Aschermann, Ali Abbasi, Thorsten HolzUSENIX Security 2019 · 被引用 34 次
- Rise of the HaCRS: Augmenting Autonomous Cyber Reasoning Systems with Human AssistanceYan Shoshitaishvili, Michael Weissbacher, Lukas Dresel, Christopher Salls 等CCS 2017 · 被引用 57 次
