Security Analysis of Emerging Smart Home Applications
Earlence Fernandes, Jaeyeon Jung, Atul Prakash
摘要
Recently, several competing smart home programming frameworks that support third party app development have emerged. These frameworks provide tangible benefits to users, but can also expose users to significant security risks. This paper presents the first in-depth empirical security analysis of one such emerging smart home programming platform. We analyzed Samsung-owned SmartThings, which has the largest number of apps among currently available smart home platforms, and supports a broad range of devices including motion sensors, fire alarms, and door locks. SmartThings hosts the application runtime on a proprietary, closed-source cloud backend, making scrutiny challenging. We overcame the challenge with a static source code analysis of 499 SmartThings apps (called SmartApps) and 132 device handlers, and carefully crafted test cases that revealed many undocumented features of the platform. Our key findings are twofold. First, although SmartThings implements a privilege separation model, we discovered two intrinsic design flaws that lead to significant overprivilege in SmartApps. Our analysis reveals that over 55% of SmartApps in the store are overprivileged due to the capabilities being too coarse-grained. Moreover, once installed, a SmartApp is granted full access to a device even if it specifies needing only limited access to the device. Second, the SmartThings event subsystem, which devices use to communicate asynchronously with SmartApps via events, does not sufficiently protect events that carry sensitive information such as lock codes. We exploited framework design flaws to construct four proof-of-concept attacks that: (1) secretly planted door lock codes, (2) stole existing door lock codes, (3) disabled vacation mode of the home, and (4) induced a fake fire alarm. We conclude the paper with security lessons for the design of emerging smart home programming frameworks.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了最后一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper65
- Understanding the Mirai BotnetManos Antonakakis, Tim April, Michael D. Bailey, Matt Bernhard 等USENIX Security 2017 · 被引用 2,003 次
- SoK: Security Evaluation of Home-Based IoT DeploymentsOmar Alrawi, Chaz Lever, Manos Antonakakis, Fabian MonroseS&P 2019 · 被引用 411 次
- BlackIoT: IoT Botnet of High Wattage Devices Can Disrupt the Power GridSaleh Soltan, Prateek Mittal, H. Vincent PoorUSENIX Security 2018 · 被引用 348 次
- ContexloT: Towards Providing Contextual Integrity to Appified IoT PlatformsYunhan Jack Jia, Qi Alfred Chen, Shiqi Wang, Amir Rahmati 等NDSS 2017 · 被引用 325 次
- FlowFence: Practical Data Protection for Emerging IoT Application FrameworksEarlence Fernandes, Justin Paupore, Amir Rahmati, Daniel Simionato 等USENIX Security 2016 · 被引用 296 次
相关 Paper
- HoMonit: Monitoring Smart Home Apps from Encrypted TrafficWei Zhang, Yan Meng, Yugeng Liu, Xiaokuan Zhang 等CCS 2018 · 被引用 201 次
- Fear and Logging in the Internet of ThingsQi Wang, Wajih Ul Hassan, Adam Bates, Carl A. GunterNDSS 2018 · 被引用 205 次
- Discovering and Understanding the Security Hazards in the Interactions between IoT Devices, Mobile Apps, and Clouds on Smart Home PlatformsWei Zhou, Yan Jia, Yao Yao, Lipeng Zhu 等USENIX Security 2019 · 被引用 160 次
- On the Safety of IoT Device Physical Interaction ControlWenbo Ding, Hongxin HuCCS 2018 · 被引用 169 次
- IoTGaze: IoT Security Enforcement via Wireless Context AnalysisTianbo Gu, Zheng Fang, Allaukik Abhishek, Hao Fu 等INFOCOM 2020 · 被引用 52 次
