From Perceptions to Decisions: Wildfire Evacuation Decision Prediction with Behavioral Theory-informed LLMs
Ruxiao Chen, Chenguang Wang, Yuran Sun, Xilei Zhao, Susu Xu
摘要
Evacuation decision prediction is critical for efficient and effective wildfire response by helping emergency management anticipate traffic congestion and bottlenecks, allocate resources, and minimize negative impacts. Traditional statistical methods for evacuation decision prediction fail to capture the complex and diverse behavioral logic of different individuals. In this work, for the first time, we introduce FLARE, short for facilitating LLM for advanced reasoning on wildfire evacuation decision prediction, a Large Language Model (LLM)-based framework that integrates behavioral theories and models to streamline the Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning and subsequently integrate with memory-based Reinforcement Learning (RL) module to provide accurate evacuation decision prediction and understanding. Our proposed method addresses the limitations of using existing LLMs for evacuation behavioral predictions, such as limited survey data, mismatching with behavioral theory, conflicting individual preferences, implicit and complex mental states, and intractable mental statebehavior mapping. Experiments on three postwildfire survey datasets show an average of 20.47% performance improvement over traditional theory-informed behavioral models, with strong cross-event generalizability. Our
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
它引用的顶会 Paper11
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma 等NeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 22,562 次
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo 等NeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 8,168 次
- Reflexion: language agents with verbal reinforcement learningNoah Shinn, Federico Cassano, Ashwin Gopinath, Karthik Narasimhan 等NeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 5,828 次
- Language Models Don't Always Say What They Think: Unfaithful Explanations in Chain-of-Thought PromptingMiles Turpin, Julian Michael, Ethan Perez, Samuel R. BowmanNeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 1,792 次
- Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language ModelsXuezhi Wang, Jason Wei, Dale Schuurmans, Quoc V. Le 等ICLR 2023 · 被引用 681 次
相关 Paper
- FLAIR: Steering LLM Mathematical Problem Solving based on A Fuzzy-Logic-AssIsted ReasonerHao Wu, Hongru Sun, Wanqing Li, Xinguo Yu 等ACL 2026
- ThinkRec: Thinking-based recommendation via LLMQihang Yu, Kairui Fu, Zheqi Lv, Shengyu Zhang 等WWW 2026 · 被引用 10 次
- Token-Efficient Long-Term Interest Sketching and Internalized Reasoning for LLM-based RecommendationZhihao Ding, Jinming Li, Shuai Mu, Jieming ShiICLR 2026
- FLARE: Faithful Logic-Aided Reasoning and ExplorationErik Arakelyan, Pasquale Minervini, Patrick S. H. Lewis, Pat Verga 等EMNLP 2025 · 被引用 1 次
- Multi-Modal Grounded Planning and Efficient Replanning for Learning Embodied Agents with a Few ExamplesTaewoong Kim, Byeonghwi Kim, Jonghyun ChoiAAAI 2025 · 被引用 8 次
