MirrorFair: Fixing Fairness Bugs in Machine Learning Software via Counterfactual Predictions
Ying Xiao, Jie M. Zhang, Yepang Liu, Mohammad Reza Mousavi, Sicen Liu, Dingyuan Xue
摘要
With the increasing utilization of Machine Learning (ML) software in critical domains such as employee hiring, college admission, and credit evaluation, ensuring fairness in the decision-making processes of underlying models has emerged as a paramount ethical concern. Nonetheless, existing methods for rectifying fairness issues can hardly strike a consistent trade-off between performance and fairness across diverse tasks and algorithms. Informed by the principles of counterfactual inference, this paper introduces MirrorFair, an innovative adaptive ensemble approach designed to mitigate fairness concerns. MirrorFair initially constructs a counterfactual dataset derived from the original data, training two distinct models—one on the original dataset and the other on the counterfactual dataset. Subsequently, MirrorFair adaptively combines these model predictions to generate fairer final decisions. We conduct an extensive evaluation of MirrorFair and compare it with 15 existing methods across a diverse range of decision-making scenarios. Our findings reveal that MirrorFair outperforms all the baselines in every measurement (i.e., fairness improvement, performance preservation, and trade-off metrics). Specifically, in <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> mml:mn93</mml:mn> mml:mo%</mml:mo> </mml:math> of cases, MirrorFair surpasses the fairness and performance trade-off baseline proposed by the benchmarking tool Fairea, whereas the state-of-the-art method achieves this in only <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> mml:mn88</mml:mn> mml:mo%</mml:mo> </mml:math> of cases. Furthermore, MirrorFair consistently demonstrates its superiority across various tasks and algorithms, ranking first in balancing model performance and fairness in <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> mml:mn83</mml:mn> mml:mo%</mml:mo> </mml:math> of scenarios. To foster replicability and future research, we have made our code, data, and results openly accessible to the research community.
问问这篇 Paper
问问你的智能体。
Lune 读过与它相关的顶会 Paper,每个回答都会注明依据哪几篇。
引用它的顶会 Paper2
- Fairness Is Not Just Ethical: Performance Trade-Off via Data Correlation Tuning to Mitigate Bias in ML SoftwareYing Xiao, Shangwen Wang, Sicen Liu, Dingyuan Xue 等ICSE 2026
- Software Fairness Dilemma: Is Bias Mitigation a Zero-Sum Game?Zhenpeng Chen, Xinyue Li, Jie M. Zhang, Weisong Sun 等FSE 2025
相关 Paper
- MAAT: a novel ensemble approach to addressing fairness and performance bugs for machine learning softwareZhenpeng Chen, Jie M. Zhang, Federica Sarro, Mark HarmanFSE 2022 · 被引用 65 次
- Fairea: a model behaviour mutation approach to benchmarking bias mitigation methodsMax Hort, Jie M. Zhang, Federica Sarro, Mark HarmanFSE 2021 · 被引用 75 次
- Counterfactual Fairness by Combining Factual and Counterfactual PredictionsZeyu Zhou, Tianci Liu, Ruqi Bai, Jing Gao 等NeurIPS 2024 · 被引用 11 次
- Diversity Drives Fairness: Ensemble of Higher Order Mutants for Intersectional Fairness of Machine Learning SoftwareZhenpeng Chen, Xinyue Li, Jie M. Zhang, Federica Sarro 等ICSE 2025 · 被引用 2 次
- Fairness Improvement with Multiple Protected Attributes: How Far Are We?Zhenpeng Chen, Jie M. Zhang, Federica Sarro, Mark HarmanICSE 2024 · 被引用 33 次
