Pauli Measurements Are Not Optimal for Single-Copy Tomography
Jayadev Acharya, Abhilash Dharmavarapu, Yuhan Liu, Nengkun Yu
摘要
Quantum state tomography is a fundamental problem in quantum computing. Given n copies of an unknown N -qubit state ρ ∈ C d×d , d = 2 N , the goal is to learn the state up to an accuracy ε in trace distance, say with at least constant probability 0.99. We are interested in the copy complexity, the minimum number of copies of ρ needed to fulfill the task. As current quantum devices are physically limited, Pauli measurements have attracted significant attention due to their ease of implementation. However, a large gap exists in the literature for tomography with Pauli measurements. The best-known upper bound is ), and no non-trivial lower bound is known besides the general single-copy lower bound of Ω( 8 N ε 2 ), achieved by hard-to-implement structured POVMs such as MUB, SIC-POVM, and uniform POVM. We have made significant progress on this long-standing problem. We first prove a stronger upper bound of O( 10 N ε 2 ). To complement it, we also obtain a lower bound of Ω( 9.118 N ε 2 ), which holds even with adaptivity. To our knowledge, this demonstrates the first known separation between Pauli measurements and structured POVMs. The new lower bound is a consequence of a novel framework for adaptive quantum state tomography with measurement constraints. The main advantage is that we can use measurement-dependent hard instances to prove tight lower bounds for Pauli measurements, while prior lower-bound techniques for tomography only work with measurement-independent constructions. Moreover, we connect the copy complexity lower bound of tomography to the eigenvalues of the measurement information channel, which governs the measurement's capacity to distinguish between states. To demonstrate the generality of the new framework, we obtain tight bounds for adaptive quantum state tomography with k-outcome measurements, where we recover existing results and establish new ones.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了最后一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper1
问问它们各自怎么用它它引用的顶会 Paper5
- Exponential Separations Between Learning With and Without Quantum MemorySitan Chen, Jordan Cotler, Hsin-Yuan Huang, Jerry LiFOCS 2021 · 被引用 79 次
- Entanglement is Necessary for Optimal Quantum Property TestingSébastien Bubeck, Sitan Chen, Jerry LiFOCS 2020 · 被引用 33 次
- Tight Bounds for Quantum State Certification with Incoherent MeasurementsSitan Chen, Jerry Li, Brice Huang, Allen LiuFOCS 2022 · 被引用 19 次
- When Does Adaptivity Help for Quantum State Learning?Sitan Chen, Brice Huang, Jerry Li, Allen Liu 等FOCS 2023 · 被引用 12 次
- An Optimal Tradeoff between Entanglement and Copy Complexity for State TomographySitan Chen, Jerry Li, Allen LiuSTOC 2024 · 被引用 9 次
相关 Paper
- Optimal Tradeoffs for Estimating Pauli ObservablesSitan Chen, Weiyuan Gong, Qi YeFOCS 2024 · 被引用 13 次
- Learning Distributions over Quantum Measurement OutcomesWeiyuan Gong, Scott AaronsonICML 2023 · 被引用 13 次
- Instance-Optimal Quantum State Certification with Entangled MeasurementsRyan O'Donnell, Chirag WadhwaSTOC 2026 · 被引用 14 次
- Adversarially Robust Quantum State Learning and TestingMaryam Aliakbarpour, Vladimir Braverman, Nai-Hui Chia, Yuhan LiuFOCS 2025
- Purest Quantum State IdentificationYingqi Yu, Honglin Chen, Jun Wu, Wei Xie 等NeurIPS 2025
