Lune

NeurIPS2021顶会

The Complexity of Sparse Tensor PCA

Davin Choo, Tommaso d'Orsi

2021年份
11被引次数
4顶会引用

摘要

We study the problem of sparse tensor principal component analysis: given a tensor Y=W+λx⊗p\pmb Y = \pmb W + \lambda x^{\otimes p} with W∈⊗pRn\pmb W \in \otimes^p\mathbb{R}^n having i.i.d. Gaussian entries, the goal is to recover the kk-sparse unit vector x∈Rnx \in \mathbb{R}^n. The model captures both sparse PCA (in its Wigner form) and tensor PCA. For the highly sparse regime of k≤nk \leq \sqrt{n}, we present a family of algorithms that smoothly interpolates between a simple polynomial-time algorithm and the exponential-time exhaustive search algorithm. For any 1≤t≤k1 \leq t \leq k, our algorithms recovers the sparse vector for signal-to-noise ratio λ≥O~(t⋅(k/t)p/2)\lambda \geq \tilde{\mathcal{O}} (\sqrt{t} \cdot (k/t)^{p/2}) in time O~(np+t)\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(n^{p+t}), capturing the state-of-the-art guarantees for the matrix settings (in both the polynomial-time and sub-exponential time regimes). Our results naturally extend to the case of rr distinct kk-sparse signals with disjoint supports, with guarantees that are independent of the number of spikes. Even in the restricted case of sparse PCA, known algorithms only recover the sparse vectors for λ≥O~(k⋅r)\lambda \geq \tilde{\mathcal{O}}(k \cdot r) while our algorithms require λ≥O~(k)\lambda \geq \tilde{\mathcal{O}}(k). Finally, by analyzing the low-degree likelihood ratio, we complement these algorithmic results with rigorous evidence illustrating the trade-offs between signal-to-noise ratio and running time. This lower bound captures the known lower bounds for both sparse PCA and tensor PCA. In this general model, we observe a more intricate three-way trade-off between the number of samples nn, the sparsity kk, and the tensor power pp.

问问这篇 Paper

智能体会读完全文。

Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。

可以从这些问题问起

智能体调用

Luneget_paper_fulltext

在 Lune 里问

免费开始,无需绑卡

引用它的顶会 Paper4

问问它们各自怎么用它

它引用的顶会 Paper2

相关 Paper

黄昏的海面,两侧是细线勾勒的悬崖