Testing and Learning Structured Quantum Hamiltonians
Srinivasan Arunachalam, Arkopal Dutt, Francisco Escudero Gutiérrez
摘要
We consider the problems of testing and learning an unknown -qubit quantum Hamiltonian expressed in its Pauli basis, from queries to its evolution operator under the normalized Frobenius norm. To this end, we prove the following results (with and without quantum memory) for Hamiltonians whose Pauli spectrum involves only -local terms or has sparsity at most : (1) Local Hamiltonians: We give a tolerant testing protocol to decide if a Hamiltonian is -close to -local or -far from -local, with queries, thereby solving two open questions posed in a recent work by Bluhm, Caro and Oufkir [BCO'24]. For learning a -local Hamiltonian up to error , we give a protocol with query complexity and total time evolution . Our algorithm leverages the non-commutative Bohnenblust-Hille inequality in order to get a complexity independent of . (2) Sparse Hamiltonians: We give a protocol for testing whether a Hamiltonian is -close to being -sparse or -far from being -sparse, with queries. For learning up to error , we show that queries suffices. (3) Learning without quantum memory: The learning results stated above have no dependence on the system size , but require -qubit quantum memory. We give subroutines that allow us to reproduce all the above learning results without quantum memory; increasing the query complexity by a (log)-factor in the local case and an -factor in the sparse case. (4) Testing without quantum memory: We give a new subroutine called Pauli hashing, which allows one to tolerantly test -sparse Hamiltonians using query complexity. A key ingredient is showing that -sparse Pauli channels can be tested in a tolerant fashion as being -close to being -sparse or -far under the diamond norm, using queries via Pauli hashing. In order to prove these results, we prove new structural theorems for local Hamiltonians, sparse Pauli channels and sparse Hamiltonians. We complement our learning algorithms with lower bounds that are polynomially weaker. Furthermore, our algorithms use short time evolutions and do not assume prior knowledge of the terms on which the Pauli spectrum is supported on, i.e., we do not require prior knowledge about the support of the Hamiltonian terms.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了最后一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper1
问问它们各自怎么用它它引用的顶会 Paper8
- Exponential Separations Between Learning With and Without Quantum MemorySitan Chen, Jordan Cotler, Hsin-Yuan Huang, Jerry LiFOCS 2021 · 被引用 79 次
- Optimal learning of quantum Hamiltonians from high-temperature Gibbs statesJeongwan Haah, Robin Kothari, Ewin TangFOCS 2022 · 被引用 35 次
- Testing and Learning Quantum Juntas Nearly OptimallyThomas Chen, Shivam Nadimpalli, Henry YuenSODA 2023 · 被引用 18 次
- Learning Quantum Hamiltonians at Any Temperature in Polynomial TimeAinesh Bakshi, Allen Liu, Ankur Moitra, Ewin TangSTOC 2024 · 被引用 14 次
- Optimal Tradeoffs for Estimating Pauli ObservablesSitan Chen, Weiyuan Gong, Qi YeFOCS 2024 · 被引用 13 次
相关 Paper
- Structure Learning of Hamiltonians from Real-Time EvolutionAinesh Bakshi, Allen Liu, Ankur Moitra, Ewin TangFOCS 2024 · 被引用 7 次
- Learning the Structure of Any Hamiltonian from Minimal AssumptionsAndrew ZhaoSTOC 2025 · 被引用 1 次
- Learning quantum Gibbs states locally and efficientlyChi-Fang Chen, Anurag Anshu, Quynh T. NguyenFOCS 2025 · 被引用 13 次
- On the Role of Entanglement and Statistics in LearningSrinivasan Arunachalam, Vojtech Havlícek, Louis SchatzkiNeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 11 次
- Clifford Testing: Algorithms and Lower BoundsMarcel Hinsche, Zongbo Bao, Philippe van Dordrecht, Jens Eisert 等STOC 2026 · 被引用 4 次
