Centrum: Model-based Database Auto-tuning with Minimal Distributional Assumptions
Yuanhao Lai, Pengfei Zheng, Chenpeng Ji, Yan Li, Songhan Zhang, Rutao Zhang, Zhengang Wang, Yunfei Du
摘要
Gaussian Process (GP)-based Bayesian optimization (BO), i.e., GP-BO, emerges as a prevailing model-based framework for DBMS (Database Management System) auto-tuning. However, recent work shows GP-BO-based DBMS auto-tuners are significantly outperformed by auto-tuners based on SMAC, which features random forest surrogate models; such results motivate us to rethink and investigate the limitations of GP-BO in auto-tuner design. We find that the fundamental assumptions of GP-BO are widely violated when modeling and optimizing DBMS performance, while tree-ensemble-BOs (e.g., SMAC) can avoid the assumption pitfalls and deliver improved tuning efficiency and effectiveness. Moreover, we argue that existing tree-ensemble-BOs restrict further advancement in DBMS auto-tuning. First, existing tree-ensemble-BOs can only achieve distribution-free point estimates, but still impose unrealistic distributional assumptions on uncertainty (interval) estimates, which can compromise surrogate modeling and distort the acquisition function. Second, recent advances in (ensemble) gradient boosting, which can further enhance surrogate modeling against vanilla GP and random forest counterparts, have rarely been applied in optimizing DBMS auto-tuners. To address these issues, we propose a novel model-based DBMS auto-tuner, Centrum . Centrum achieves and improves distribution-free point and interval estimation in surrogate modeling with a two-phase learning procedure of stochastic gradient boosting ensembles (SGBE). Moreover, Centrum adopts a generalized SGBE-estimated locally-adaptive conformal prediction to facilitate a distribution-free interval (uncertainty) estimation and acquisition function. To our knowledge, Centrum is the first auto-tuner that realizes distribution-freeness to stress and enhance BO's practicality in DBMS auto-tuning, and the first to seamlessly fuse gradient boosting ensembles and conformal inference in BO. Extensive physical and simulation experiments on two DBMSs and three workloads show that Centrum outperforms 21 state-of-the-art (SOTA) DBMS auto-tuners based on BO with GP, random forest, gradient boosting, OOB (Out-Of-Bag) conformal ensemble and other surrogates, as well as that based on reinforcement learning and genetic algorithms.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
它引用的顶会 Paper18
- Revisiting Deep Learning Models for Tabular DataYury Gorishniy, Ivan Rubachev, Valentin Khrulkov, Artem BabenkoNeurIPS 2021 · 被引用 1,847 次
- NGBoost: Natural Gradient Boosting for Probabilistic PredictionTony Duan, Anand Avati, Daisy Yi Ding, Khanh K. Thai 等ICML 2020 · 被引用 433 次
- Unexpected Improvements to Expected Improvement for Bayesian OptimizationSebastian Ament, Samuel Daulton, David Eriksson, Maximilian Balandat 等NeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 280 次
- Conformal prediction interval for dynamic time-seriesChen Xu, Yao XieICML 2021 · 被引用 174 次
- Learning Search Space Partition for Black-box Optimization using Monte Carlo Tree SearchLinnan Wang, Rodrigo Fonseca, Yuandong TianNeurIPS 2020 · 被引用 163 次
相关 Paper
- CoffeeBoost: Gradient Boosting Native Conformal Inference for Bayesian OptimizationYuanhao Lai, Pengfei Zheng, Chenpeng Ji, Cheng Qiu 等AAAI 2025 · 被引用 1 次
- TopTune: Tailored Optimization for Categorical and Continuous Knobs Towards Accelerated and Improved Database Performance TuningRukai Wei, Yu Liu, Yufeng Hou, Heng Cui 等ICDE 2025 · 被引用 1 次
- Conformal Prediction as Bayesian QuadratureJake C. Snell, Thomas L. GriffithsICML 2025
- Boosted Conformal Prediction IntervalsRan Xie, Rina Barber, Emmanuel J. CandèsNeurIPS 2024 · 被引用 34 次
- DOT: Dynamic Knob Selection and Online Sampling for Automated Database TuningYifan Wang, Debabrota Basu, Pierre Bourhis, Romain Rouvoy 等VLDB 2026
