GraphEval: A Lightweight Graph-Based LLM Framework for Idea Evaluation
Tao Feng, Yihang Sun, Jiaxuan You
摘要
The powerful capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) have led to their growing use in evaluating human-generated content, particularly in evaluating research ideas within academic settings. Existing solutions primarily rely on prompt-based LLM methods or fine-tuned lightweight language models for idea evaluation. However, these methods are often unstable and struggle to comprehend the complex semantic information embedded in the ideas, impeding their ability to perform highquality evaluations. To address the above challenges, we propose GraphEval, a lightweight graph-based LLM framework for idea evaluation. Our insight is that a complex idea can be broken down into comprehensible viewpoint-nodes using small prompted LLMs. These viewpoint-nodes can then be linked together through edges created from LLM-based relation extraction and/or BERT similarity scores. The created viewpoint-graph can be used to conveniently propagate scores across viewpoint-nodes to improve the robustness of the idea evaluations. In particular, we propose two lightweight graph-based methods for idea evaluation: (1) GraphEval-LP: a training-free label propagation algorithm that propagates quality labels from known viewpoint-nodes to unknown nodes; (2) GraphEval-GNN: a Graph Neural Network (GNN) that is trained to predict the quality labels given the observed graph with minimal computation resources. Moreover, to overcome LLM's limitation in objectively assessing the novelty of ideas, we further propose a novelty detection model to GraphEval-GNN to enhance its capability in judging idea novelty. Experiments on two datasets show GraphEval improves F1 scores by at least 14% with low computation and API costs. Additionally, GraphEval can effectively detect plagiarized ideas. Our codes for GraphEval is released at https://github.com/ulab-uiuc/GraphEval .
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper6
- The Ideation-Execution Gap: Execution Outcomes of LLM-Generated versus Human Research IdeasChenglei Si, Tatsunori Hashimoto, Diyi YangICLR 2026 · 被引用 60 次
- From Generation to Judgment: Opportunities and Challenges of LLM-as-a-judgeDawei Li, Bohan Jiang, Liangjie Huang, Alimohammad Beigi 等EMNLP 2025 · 被引用 37 次
- From Automation to Autonomy: A Survey on Large Language Models in Scientific DiscoveryTianshi Zheng, Zheye Deng, Hong Ting Tsang, Weiqi Wang 等EMNLP 2025 · 被引用 5 次
- ARCHE: A Novel Task to Evaluate LLMs on Latent Reasoning Chain ExtractionPengze Li, Jiaqi Liu, Junchi Yu, Lihao Liu 等AAAI 2026 · 被引用 1 次
- Beyond Noise: Characterizing Creative Potential in Unverifiable LLM HallucinationsYu Yan, Chunhong Zhang, Haiyu Zhao, Ziyang Zeng 等ACL 2026
它引用的顶会 Paper12
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah 等NeurIPS 2020 · 被引用 64,255 次
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma 等NeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 22,562 次
- Reflexion: language agents with verbal reinforcement learningNoah Shinn, Federico Cassano, Ashwin Gopinath, Karthik Narasimhan 等NeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 5,828 次
- Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language ModelsShunyu Yao, Dian Yu, Jeffrey Zhao, Izhak Shafran 等NeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 5,068 次
- LightGCN: Simplifying and Powering Graph Convolution Network for RecommendationXiangnan He, Kuan Deng, Xiang Wang, Yan Li 等SIGIR 2020 · 被引用 4,448 次
相关 Paper
- Can Large Language Models Unlock Novel Scientific Research Ideas?Sandeep Kumar, Tirthankar Ghosal, Vinayak Goyal, Asif EkbalEMNLP 2025 · 被引用 3 次
- Semantic-Eval : A Semantic Comprehension Evaluation Framework for Large Language Models Generation without TrainingShusheng Li, Jiale Li, Yifei Qu, Xinwei Shi 等ACL 2025
- Can LLMs Generate Novel Research Ideas? A Large-Scale Human Study with 100+ NLP ResearchersChenglei Si, Diyi Yang, Tatsunori HashimotoICLR 2025
- InnoEval: On Research Idea Evaluation as a Knowledge-Grounded, Multi-Perspective Reasoning ProblemShuofei Qiao, Yunxiang Wei, Xuehai Wang, Bin Wu 等ICML 2026
- GraphMind: Unveiling Scientific Reasoning through Contextual Graphs for Novelty AssessmentItalo Luis da Silva, Hanqi Yan, Lin Gui, Yulan HeKDD 2026 · 被引用 1 次
