BoundarEase: Fostering Constructive Community Engagement to Inform More Equitable Student Assignment Policies
Cassandra Overney, Cassandra Moe, Alvin Chang, Nabeel Gillani
摘要
Public school districts across the United States (US) play a pivotal role in shaping access to quality education through their student assignment policies---most prominently, school attendance boundaries. Community engagement processes for changing such policies, however, are often opaque, cumbersome, and highly polarizing---hampering equitable access to quality schools in ways that can perpetuate disparities in achievement and future life outcomes. In this paper, we describe a collaboration with a large US public school district serving nearly 150,000 students to design and evaluate a new sociotechnical system, "BoundarEase", for fostering more constructive community engagement around changing school attendance boundaries. Through a formative study with 16 community members, we first identify several frictions in existing community engagement processes during boundary planning, like individualistic over collective thinking; a failure to understand and empathize with different community members when considering policy impacts; and challenges in accessing and understanding the impacts of boundary changes. We then use these frictions to inspire the design and development of BoundarEase, a web platform that allows community members to explore and offer feedback on potential boundaries based on their preferences. A user study with 12 community members reveals that BoundarEase prompts reflection among community members on how policies might impact families beyond their own, and increases transparency around the details of policy proposals. Our paper offers education researchers insights into the challenges and opportunities involved in community engagement for designing student assignment policies; human-computer interaction researchers a case study of how new sociotechnical systems might help mitigate polarization in local policymaking; and school districts a practical tool they might use to facilitate community engagement to foster more equitable student assignment policies.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper1
问问它们各自怎么用它它引用的顶会 Paper2
- CommunityClick: Capturing and Reporting Community Feedback from Town Halls to Improve Inclusivity Share onMahmood Jasim, Pooya Khaloo, Somin Wadhwa, Amy X. Zhang 等CSCW 2020 · 被引用 40 次
- Finding Place in a Design Space: Challenges for Supporting Community Design Efforts at ScaleStephen MacNeil, Zijian Ding, Ashley Boone, Anthony Bryce Grubbs 等CSCW 2021 · 被引用 11 次
相关 Paper
- Redistrict: Online Public Deliberation Support that Connects and Rebuilds Inclusive CommunitiesAndreea Sistrunk, Nathan Self, Subhodip Biswas, Kurt Luther 等CSCW 2024 · 被引用 5 次
- Modeling Assumptions Clash with the Real World: Transparency, Equity, and Community Challenges for Student Assignment AlgorithmsSamantha Robertson, Tonya Nguyen, Niloufar SalehiCHI 2021 · 被引用 57 次
- School Redistricting: Wiping Unfairness Off the MapAriel D. Procaccia, Isaac Robinson, Jamie Tucker-FoltzSODA 2024 · 被引用 3 次
- Expressiveness, Cost, and Collectivism: How the Design of Preference Languages Shapes Participation in Algorithmic Decision-MakingSamantha Robertson, Tonya Nguyen, Cathy Hu, Catherine Albiston 等CHI 2023 · 被引用 5 次
- On the Desiderata for Online Altruism: Nudging for Equitable DonationsNuno Mota, Abhijnan Chakraborty, Asia J. Biega, Krishna P. Gummadi 等CSCW 2020 · 被引用 9 次
