FORGE: An LLM-driven Framework for Large-Scale Smart Contract Vulnerability Dataset Construction
Jiachi Chen, Yiming Shen, Jiashuo Zhang, Zihao Li, John Grundy, Zhenzhe Shao, Yanlin Wang, Jiashui Wang, Ting Chen, Zibin Zheng
摘要
High-quality smart contract vulnerability datasets are critical for evaluating security tools and advancing smart contract security research. Two major limitations of current manual dataset construction are (1) labor-intensive and error-prone annotation processes limiting the scale, quality, and evolution of the dataset, and (2) absence of standardized classification rules results in inconsistent vulnerability categories and labeling results across different datasets. To address these limitations, we present FORGE, the first automated approach for constructing smart contract vulnerability datasets. FORGE leverages an LLM-driven pipeline to extract high-quality vulnerabilities from real-world audit reports and classify them according to the CWE, the most widely recognized classification in software security. FORGE employs a divide-and-conquer strategy to extract structured and self-contained vulnerability information from these reports. Additionally, it uses a tree-of-thoughts technique to classify the vulnerability information into the hierarchical CWE classification. To evaluate FORGE's effectiveness, we run FORGE on 6,454 real-world audit reports and generate a dataset comprising 81,390 solidity files and 27,497 vulnerability findings across 296 CWE categories. Manual assessment of the dataset demonstrates high extraction precision and classification consistency with human experts (precision of 95.6% and inter-rater agreement k- of 0.87). We further validate the practicality of our dataset by benchmarking 13 existing security tools on our dataset. The results reveal the significant limitations in current detection capabilities. Furthermore, by analyzing the severity-frequency distribution patterns through a unified CWE perspective in our dataset, we highlight inconsistency between current smart contract research focus and priorities identified from real-world vulnerabilities...
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper2
- Out of Distribution, Out of Luck: How Well Can LLMs Trained on Vulnerability Datasets Detect Top 25 CWE Weaknesses?Yikun Li, Ngoc Tan Bui, Ting Zhang, Chengran Yang 等ICSE 2026 · 被引用 2 次
- EventSpec: Defining and Detecting Event-Semantic Issues in Blockchain EcosystemsYixuan Liu, Yuxin Dong, Ye Liu, Yin Wu 等ISSTA 2026
它引用的顶会 Paper23
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo 等NeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 8,168 次
- Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language ModelsShunyu Yao, Dian Yu, Jeffrey Zhao, Izhak Shafran 等NeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 5,068 次
- Making Smart Contracts SmarterLoi Luu, Duc-Hiep Chu, Hrishi Olickel, Prateek Saxena 等CCS 2016 · 被引用 2,306 次
- Securify: Practical Security Analysis of Smart ContractsPetar Tsankov, Andrei Marian Dan, Dana Drachsler-Cohen, Arthur Gervais 等CCS 2018 · 被引用 1,108 次
- A Survey on In-context LearningQingxiu Dong, Lei Li, Damai Dai, Ce Zheng 等EMNLP 2024 · 被引用 479 次
相关 Paper
- Have We Solved Access Control Vulnerability Detection in Smart Contracts? A Benchmark StudyHan Liu, Daoyuan Wu, Yuqiang Sun, Shuai Wang 等ASE 2025 · 被引用 1 次
- Empirical evaluation of smart contract testing: what is the best choice?Meng Ren, Zijing Yin, Fuchen Ma, Zhenyang Xu 等ISSTA 2021 · 被引用 83 次
- FORAY: Towards Effective Attack Synthesis against Deep Logical Vulnerabilities in DeFi ProtocolsHongbo Wen, Hanzhi Liu, Jiaxin Song, Yanju Chen 等CCS 2024 · 被引用 6 次
- Empirical review of automated analysis tools on 47, 587 Ethereum smart contractsThomas Durieux, João F. Ferreira, Rui Abreu, Pedro CruzICSE 2020 · 被引用 373 次
- Smart-LLaMA-DPO: Reinforced Large Language Model for Explainable Smart Contract Vulnerability DetectionLei Yu, Zhirong Huang, Hang Yuan, Shiqi Cheng 等ISSTA 2025 · 被引用 13 次
