ML-LJP: Multi-Law Aware Legal Judgment Prediction
Yifei Liu, Yiquan Wu, Yating Zhang, Changlong Sun, Weiming Lu, Fei Wu, Kun Kuang
摘要
Legal judgment prediction (LJP) is a significant task in legal intelligence, which aims to assist the judges and determine the judgment result based on the case's fact description. The judgment result consists of law articles, charge, and prison term. The law articles serve as the basis for the charge and the prison term, which can be divided into two types, named as charge-related law article and term-related law article, respectively. Recently, many methods have been proposed and made tremendous progress in LJP. However, the existing methods only focus on the prediction of the charge-related law articles, ignoring the term-related law articles (e.g., laws about lenient treatment), which limits the performance in the prison term prediction. In this paper, following the actual legal process, we expand the law article prediction as a multi-label classification task that includes both the charge-related law articles and term-related law articles and propose a novel multi-law aware LJP (ML-LJP) method to improve the performance of LJP. Given the case's fact description, firstly, the label (e.g., law article and charge) definitions in the Code of Law are used to transform the representation of the fact into several label-specific representations and make the prediction of the law articles and the charge. To distinguish the similar content of different label definitions, contrastive learning is conducted in the training. Then, a graph attention network (GAT) is applied to learn the interactions among the multiple law articles for the prediction of the prison term. Since numbers (e.g., amount of theft and weight of drugs) are important for LJP but often ignored by conventional encoders, we design a corresponding number representation method to locate and better represent these effective numbers. Extensive experiments on real-world dataset show that our method achieves the best results compared to the state-of-the-art models, especially in the task of prison term prediction where ML-LJP achieves a 10.07% relative improvement over the best baseline.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper10
- Explicitly Integrating Judgment Prediction with Legal Document Retrieval: A Law-Guided Generative ApproachWeicong Qin, Zelin Cao, Weijie Yu, Zihua Si 等SIGIR 2024 · 被引用 17 次
- Legal Case Retrieval: A Survey of the State of the ArtYi Feng, Chuanyi Li, Vincent NgACL 2024 · 被引用 15 次
- LegalReasoner: Step-wised Verification-Correction for Legal Judgment ReasoningWeijie Shi, Han Zhu, Jiaming Ji, Mengze Li 等ACL 2025 · 被引用 10 次
- De-biased Attention Supervision for Text Classification with CausalityYiquan Wu, Yifei Liu, Ziyu Zhao, Weiming Lu 等AAAI 2024 · 被引用 10 次
- AuG-KD: Anchor-Based Mixup Generation for Out-of-Domain Knowledge DistillationZihao Tang, Zheqi Lv, Shengyu Zhang, Yifan Zhou 等ICLR 2024 · 被引用 5 次
它引用的顶会 Paper21
- A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual RepresentationsTing Chen, Simon Kornblith, Mohammad Norouzi, Geoffrey E. HintonICML 2020 · 被引用 24,064 次
- Supervised Contrastive LearningPrannay Khosla, Piotr Teterwak, Chen Wang, Aaron Sarna 等NeurIPS 2020 · 被引用 7,049 次
- SimCSE: Simple Contrastive Learning of Sentence EmbeddingsTianyu Gao, Xingcheng Yao, Danqi ChenEMNLP 2021 · 被引用 2,496 次
- ELECTRA: Pre-training Text Encoders as Discriminators Rather Than GeneratorsKevin Clark, Minh-Thang Luong, Quoc V. Le, Christopher D. ManningICLR 2020 · 被引用 541 次
- JEC-QA: A Legal-Domain Question Answering DatasetHaoxi Zhong, Chaojun Xiao, Cunchao Tu, Tianyang Zhang 等AAAI 2020 · 被引用 212 次
相关 Paper
- Distinguish Confusing Law Articles for Legal Judgment PredictionNuo Xu, Pinghui Wang, Long Chen, Li Pan 等ACL 2020 · 被引用 150 次
- Legal Judgment Prediction via Relational LearningQian Dong, Shuzi NiuSIGIR 2021 · 被引用 53 次
- NeurJudge: A Circumstance-aware Neural Framework for Legal Judgment PredictionLinan Yue, Qi Liu, Binbin Jin, Han Wu 等SIGIR 2021 · 被引用 83 次
- Towards Interactivity and Interpretability: A Rationale-based Legal Judgment Prediction FrameworkYiquan Wu, Yifei Liu, Weiming Lu, Yating Zhang 等EMNLP 2022 · 被引用 33 次
- Judgment Prediction via Injecting Legal Knowledge into Neural NetworksLeilei Gan, Kun Kuang, Yi Yang, Fei WuAAAI 2021 · 被引用 72 次
