Sloth: scaling laws for LLM skills to predict multi-benchmark performance across families
Felipe Maia Polo, Seamus Somerstep, Leshem Choshen, Yuekai Sun, Mikhail Yurochkin
摘要
Scaling laws for large language models (LLMs) predict model performance based on parameters like size and training data. However, differences in training configurations and data processing across model families lead to significant variations in benchmark performance, making it difficult for a single scaling law to generalize across all LLMs. On the other hand, training family-specific scaling laws requires training models of varying sizes for every family. In this work, we propose Skills Scaling Laws (SSLaws, pronounced as Sloth), a novel scaling law that leverages publicly available benchmark data and assumes LLM performance is driven by low-dimensional latent skills, such as reasoning and instruction following. These latent skills are influenced by computational resources like model size and training tokens, but with varying efficiencies across model families. Sloth exploits correlations across benchmarks to provide more accurate and interpretable predictions while alleviating the need to train multiple LLMs per family. We present both theoretical results on parameter identification and empirical evaluations on 12 prominent benchmarks, from Open LLM Leaderboard v1/v2, demonstrating that Sloth predicts LLM performance accurately and offers insights into scaling behaviors for complex downstream tasks, increased test-time compute, and compute-optimal scaling of skills. Our code can be found on https://github.com/felipemaiapolo/sloth.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper5
- Active Budget Allocation for Efficient Scaling Law Estimation via Surrogate-Guided PruningViktoria Schram, Markus Hiller, Daniel Beck, Trevor CohnICML 2026
- AI Cartography: Mapping the Latent Landscape of AI Benchmark EcosystemsMichael Hardy, Anka Reuel, Lijin Zhang, Jodi Casabianca 等ICML 2026
- A Hitchhiker's Guide to Scaling Law EstimationLeshem Choshen, Yang Zhang, Jacob AndreasICML 2025
- A Systematic Analysis of Base Model Choice for Reward ModelingKian Ahrabian, Pegah Jandaghi, Negar Mokhberian, Sai Praneeth Karimireddy 等EMNLP 2025
- How Do Large Language Monkeys Get Their Power (Laws)?Rylan Schaeffer, Joshua Kazdan, John Hughes, Jordan Juravsky 等ICML 2025
它引用的顶会 Paper12
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou 等ICLR 2021 · 被引用 7,905 次
- TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human FalsehoodsStephanie Lin, Jacob Hilton, Owain EvansACL 2022 · 被引用 3,228 次
- WinoGrande: An Adversarial Winograd Schema Challenge at ScaleKeisuke Sakaguchi, Ronan Le Bras, Chandra Bhagavatula, Yejin ChoiAAAI 2020 · 被引用 3,037 次
- Scaling Data-Constrained Language ModelsNiklas Muennighoff, Alexander M. Rush, Boaz Barak, Teven Le Scao 等NeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 475 次
- A Constructive Prediction of the Generalization Error Across ScalesJonathan S. Rosenfeld, Amir Rosenfeld, Yonatan Belinkov, Nir ShavitICLR 2020 · 被引用 265 次
相关 Paper
- Observational Scaling Laws and the Predictability of Langauge Model PerformanceYangjun Ruan, Chris J. Maddison, Tatsunori B. HashimotoNeurIPS 2024
- Revisiting the Scaling Properties of Downstream Metrics in Large Language Model TrainingJakub Krajewski, Amitis Shidani, Dan Busbridge, Sam Wiseman 等ICLR 2026 · 被引用 8 次
- Item Response Scaling Laws: A Measurement Theory Approach for Efficient and Generalizable Neural Scaling EstimationSang Truong, Yuheng Tu, Rylan Schaeffer, Sanmi KoyejoICML 2026
- Collaborative Performance Prediction for Large Language ModelsQiyuan Zhang, Fuyuan Lyu, Xue Liu, Chen MaEMNLP 2024 · 被引用 1 次
- metabench - A Sparse Benchmark of Reasoning and Knowledge in Large Language ModelsAlexander Kipnis, Konstantinos Voudouris, Luca M. Schulze Buschoff, Eric SchulzICLR 2025
