Language-Agnostic Detection of Computation-Constraint Inconsistencies in ZKP Programs Via Value Inference

Zero-knowledge proofs (ZKPs) allow a prover to convince a verifier of a statement's truth without revealing any other information. In recent years, ZKPs have matured into a practical technology underpinning major applications. However, implementing ZKP programs remains challenging, as they operate over arithmetic circuits that encode the logic of both the prover and the verifier. Therefore, developers must not only express the computations for generating proofs, but also explicitly specify the constraints for verification. As recent studies have shown, this decoupling may lead to critical ZKP-specific vulnerabilities. Unfortunately, existing tools for detecting them are limited, as they: (1) are tightly coupled to specific ZKP languages, (2) are confined to the constraint level, preventing reasoning about the underlying computations, (3) target only a narrow class of bugs, and (4) suffer from scalability bottlenecks due to reliance on SMT solvers. To address these limitations, we propose a language-agnostic formal model, called the Domain Consistency Model (DCM), which captures the relationship between computations and constraints. Using this model, we provide a taxonomy of vulnerabilities based on computationconstraint mismatches, including novel subclasses overlooked by existing models. Next, we implement an IR-based bug detection tool, called CCC-CHECK, which is based on abstract interpretation. Our evaluation shows that CCC-CHECK is, on average, two orders of magnitude faster than the SoTA verification tool CIVER, while achieving comparable precision. Finally, using the DCM, we examine six widely adopted ZKP projects and uncover 15 previously unknown vulnerabilities. We reported these bugs to the projects' maintainers, 13 of which have since been patched. Of these $\mathbf{1 5}$ vulnerabilities, 12 could not be captured by existing models.