SCOUT: Teaching Pre-trained Language Models to Enhance Reasoning via Flow Chain-of-Thought
Guanghao Li, Wenhao Jiang, Mingfeng Chen, Yan Li, Hao Yu, Shuting Dong, Tao Ren, Ming Tang, Chun Yuan
摘要
Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting improves the reasoning performance of large language models (LLMs) by encouraging step-by-step thinking. However, CoTbased methods depend on intermediate reasoning steps, which limits scalability and generalization. Recent work explores recursive reasoning, where LLMs reuse internal layers across iterations to refine latent representations without explicit CoT supervision. While promising, these approaches often require costly pretraining and lack a principled framework for how reasoning should evolve across iterations. We address this gap by introducing Flow Chain-of-Thought (Flow CoT), a reasoning paradigm that models recursive inference as a progressive trajectory of latent cognitive states. Flow CoT frames each iteration as a distinct cognitive stage-deepening reasoning across iterations without relying on manual supervision. To realize this, we propose SCOUT (Stepwise Cognitive Optimization Using Teachers), a lightweight fine-tuning framework that enables Flow CoT-style reasoning without the need for pretraining. SCOUT uses progressive distillation to align each iteration with a teacher of appropriate capacity, and a cross-attention-based retrospective module that integrates outputs from previous iterations while preserving the model's original computation flow. Experiments across eight reasoning benchmarks show that SCOUT consistently improves both accuracy and explanation quality, achieving up to 1.8% gains under fine-tuning. Qualitative analyses further reveal that SCOUT enables progressively deeper reasoning across iterations-refining both belief formation and explanation granularity. These results not only validate the effectiveness of SCOUT, but also demonstrate the practical viability of Flow CoT as a scalable framework for enhancing reasoning in LLMs.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
它引用的顶会 Paper27
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma 等NeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 22,562 次
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou 等ICLR 2021 · 被引用 7,905 次
- TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human FalsehoodsStephanie Lin, Jacob Hilton, Owain EvansACL 2022 · 被引用 3,228 次
- Improved Knowledge Distillation via Teacher AssistantSeyed-Iman Mirzadeh, Mehrdad Farajtabar, Ang Li, Nir Levine 等AAAI 2020 · 被引用 1,361 次
- On the Efficacy of Knowledge DistillationJang Hyun Cho, Bharath HariharanICCV 2019 · 被引用 741 次
相关 Paper
- Fine-Tuning on Diverse Reasoning Chains Drives Within-Inference CoT Refinement in LLMsHaritz Puerto, Tilek Chubakov, Xiaodan Zhu, Harish Tayyar Madabushi 等ACL 2025 · 被引用 13 次
- UniCoTT: A Unified Framework for Structural Chain-of-Thought DistillationXianwei Zhuang, Zhihong Zhu, Zhichang Wang, Xuxin Cheng 等ICLR 2025
- Why Prompt Design Matters and Works: A Complexity Analysis of Prompt Search Space in LLMsXiang Zhang, Juntai Cao, Chenyu You, Dujian DingACL 2025 · 被引用 21 次
- Symbolic Chain-of-Thought Distillation: Small Models Can Also "Think" Step-by-StepLiunian Harold Li, Jack Hessel, Youngjae Yu, Xiang Ren 等ACL 2023 · 被引用 34 次
- Large Language Models Are Reasoning TeachersNamgyu Ho, Laura Schmid, Se-Young YunACL 2023 · 被引用 102 次
