Offline RL with No OOD Actions: In-Sample Learning via Implicit Value Regularization
Haoran Xu, Li Jiang, Jianxiong Li, Zhuoran Yang, Zhaoran Wang, Wai Kin Victor Chan, Xianyuan Zhan
摘要
Most offline reinforcement learning (RL) methods suffer from the trade-off between improving the policy to surpass the behavior policy and constraining the policy to limit the deviation from the behavior policy as computing Q-values using outof-distribution (OOD) actions will suffer from errors due to distributional shift. The recent proposed In-sample Learning paradigm (i.e., IQL), which improves the policy by quantile regression using only data samples, shows great promise because it learns an optimal policy without querying the value function of any unseen actions. However, it remains unclear how this type of method handles the distributional shift in learning the value function. In this work, we make a key finding that the in-sample learning paradigm arises under the Implicit Value Regularization (IVR) framework. This gives a deeper understanding of why the in-sample learning paradigm works, i.e., it applies implicit value regularization to the policy. Based on the IVR framework, we further propose two practical algorithms, Sparse Q-learning (SQL) and Exponential Q-learning (EQL), which adopt the same value regularization used in existing works, but in a complete insample manner. Compared with IQL, we find that our algorithms introduce sparsity in learning the value function, making them more robust in noisy data regimes. We also verify the effectiveness of SQL and EQL on D4RL benchmark datasets and show the benefits of in-sample learning by comparing them with CQL in small data regimes. Code is available at https://github.com/ryanxhr/IVR .
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper81
- HIQL: Offline Goal-Conditioned RL with Latent States as ActionsSeohong Park, Dibya Ghosh, Benjamin Eysenbach, Sergey LevineNeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 173 次
- Is Value Learning Really the Main Bottleneck in Offline RL?Seohong Park, Kevin Frans, Sergey Levine, Aviral KumarNeurIPS 2024 · 被引用 99 次
- Inverse Preference Learning: Preference-based RL without a Reward FunctionJoey Hejna, Dorsa SadighNeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 92 次
- A Policy-Guided Imitation Approach for Offline Reinforcement LearningHaoran Xu, Li Jiang, Jianxiong Li, Xianyuan ZhanNeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 86 次
- Safe Offline Reinforcement Learning with Feasibility-Guided Diffusion ModelYinan Zheng, Jianxiong Li, Dongjie Yu, Yujie Yang 等ICLR 2024 · 被引用 72 次
它引用的顶会 Paper20
- Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement LearningAviral Kumar, Aurick Zhou, George Tucker, Sergey LevineNeurIPS 2020 · 被引用 2,881 次
- Decision Transformer: Reinforcement Learning via Sequence ModelingLili Chen, Kevin Lu, Aravind Rajeswaran, Kimin Lee 等NeurIPS 2021 · 被引用 2,557 次
- Offline Reinforcement Learning with Implicit Q-LearningIlya Kostrikov, Ashvin Nair, Sergey LevineICLR 2022 · 被引用 1,402 次
- A Minimalist Approach to Offline Reinforcement LearningScott Fujimoto, Shixiang Shane GuNeurIPS 2021 · 被引用 1,292 次
- Deep Reinforcement Learning at the Edge of the Statistical PrecipiceRishabh Agarwal, Max Schwarzer, Pablo Samuel Castro, Aaron C. Courville 等NeurIPS 2021 · 被引用 1,067 次
相关 Paper
- Learning to Trust Bellman Updates: Selective State-Adaptive Regularization for Offline RLQin-Wen Luo, Ming-Kun Xie, Ye-Wen Wang, Sheng-Jun HuangICML 2025
- ACTIVE: Offline Reinforcement Learning via Adaptive Imitation and In-sample V-EnsembleTianyuan Chen, Ronglong Cai, Faguo Wu, Xiao ZhangICLR 2025
- REG: In-Sample RL via Regularizing the Evaluation GapHanpu Shen, Weining Shen, Roy FoxICML 2026
- Offline Reinforcement Learning with Value-based Episodic MemoryXiaoteng Ma, Yiqin Yang, Hao Hu, Jun Yang 等ICLR 2022 · 被引用 51 次
- Mildly Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement LearningJiafei Lyu, Xiaoteng Ma, Xiu Li, Zongqing LuNeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 173 次
