From Chaos to Clarity: A Knowledge Graph-Driven Audit Dataset Generation Framework for LLM Unlearning
Weipeng Jiang, Juan Zhai, Shiqing Ma, Ziyan Lei, Xiaofei Xie, Yige Wang, Chao Shen
摘要
Recently LLMs have faced increasing demands to selectively remove specific information through Machine Unlearning. While evaluating unlearning effectiveness is crucial, existing benchmarks suffer from fundamental limitations in audit dataset generation from unstructured corpora. We identify two critical challenges: ensuring audit adequacy and handling knowledge redundancy between forget and retain datasets. Current approaches rely on ad-hoc question generation from unstructured text, leading to unpredictable coverage gaps and evaluation blind spots. Knowledge redundancy between forget and retain corpora further obscures evaluation, making it difficult to distinguish genuine unlearning failures from legitimately retained knowledge. To bring clarity to this challenge, we propose LUCID, an automated framework that leverages knowledge graphs to achieve comprehensive audit dataset generation with fine-grained coverage and systematic redundancy elimination. By converting unstructured corpora into structured knowledge representations, it transforms the ad-hoc audit dataset generation process into a transparent and automated generation pipeline that ensures both adequacy and non-redundancy. Applying LUCID to the MUSE benchmark, we generated over 69,000 and 111,000 audit cases for News and Books datasets respectively, identifying thousands of previously undetected knowledge memorization instances. Our analysis reveals that knowledge redundancy significantly skews metrics, artificially inflating ROUGE from 19.7% to 26.1% and Entailment Scores from 32.4% to 35.2%, highlighting the necessity of deduplication for accurate assessment.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
它引用的顶会 Paper14
- Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code GenerationJiawei Liu, Chunqiu Steven Xia, Yuyao Wang, Lingming ZhangNeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 2,317 次
- Machine UnlearningLucas Bourtoule, Varun Chandrasekaran, Christopher A. Choquette-Choo, Hengrui Jia 等S&P 2021 · 被引用 1,381 次
- Large Language Model UnlearningYuanshun Yao, Xiaojun Xu, Yang LiuNeurIPS 2024 · 被引用 365 次
- In-Context Unlearning: Language Models as Few-Shot UnlearnersMartin Pawelczyk, Seth Neel, Himabindu LakkarajuICML 2024 · 被引用 217 次
- Large Language Model Unlearning via Embedding-Corrupted PromptsChris Yuhao Liu, Yaxuan Wang, Jeffrey Flanigan, Yang LiuNeurIPS 2024 · 被引用 138 次
相关 Paper
- Do LLMs Really Forget? Evaluating Unlearning with Knowledge Correlation and Confidence AwarenessRongzhe Wei, Peizhi Niu, Hans Hao-Hsun Hsu, Ruihan Wu 等NeurIPS 2025 · 被引用 20 次
- MUSE: Machine Unlearning Six-Way Evaluation for Language ModelsWeijia Shi, Jaechan Lee, Yangsibo Huang, Sadhika Malladi 等ICLR 2025
- Towards Effective Evaluations and Comparisons for LLM Unlearning MethodsQizhou Wang, Bo Han, Puning Yang, Jianing Zhu 等ICLR 2025
- Probing Hidden Knowledge Holes in Unlearned LLMsMyeongseob Ko, Hoang Anh Just, Charles Fleming, Ming Jin 等NeurIPS 2025 · 被引用 3 次
- SEPS: A Separability Measure for Robust Unlearning in LLMsWonje Jeung, Sangyeon Yoon, Albert NoEMNLP 2025
