One Explanation is Not Enough: Structured Attention Graphs for Image Classification
Vivswan Shitole, Fuxin Li, Minsuk Kahng, Prasad Tadepalli, Alan Fern
摘要
Saliency maps are popular tools for explaining the decisions of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for image classification. Typically, for each image of interest, a single saliency map is produced, which assigns weights to pixels based on their importance to the classification. We argue that a single saliency map provides an incomplete understanding since there are often many other maps that can explain a classification equally well. In this paper, we propose to utilize a beam search algorithm to systematically search for multiple explanations for each image. Results show that there are indeed multiple relatively localized explanations for many images. However, naively showing multiple explanations to users can be overwhelming and does not reveal their common and distinct structures. We introduce structured attention graphs (SAGs), which compactly represent sets of attention maps for an image by visualizing how different combinations of image regions impact the confidence of a classifier. An approach to computing a compact and representative SAG for visualization is proposed via diverse sampling. We conduct a user study comparing the use of SAGs to traditional saliency maps for answering comparative counterfactual questions about image classifications. Our results show that user accuracy is increased significantly when presented with SAGs compared to standard saliency map baselines.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper8
- "Help Me Help the AI": Understanding How Explainability Can Support Human-AI InteractionSunnie S. Y. Kim, Elizabeth Anne Watkins, Olga Russakovsky, Ruth Fong 等CHI 2023 · 被引用 178 次
- Learning Support and Trivial Prototypes for Interpretable Image ClassificationChong Wang, Yuyuan Liu, Yuanhong Chen, Fengbei Liu 等ICCV 2023 · 被引用 50 次
- I Am Big, You Are Little; I Am Right, You Are WrongDavid A. Kelly, Akchunya Chanchal, Nathan BlakeICCV 2025 · 被引用 9 次
- Enhance Sketch Recognition's Explainability via Semantic Component-Level ParsingGuangming Zhu, Siyuan Wang, Tianci Wu, Liang ZhangAAAI 2024 · 被引用 2 次
- Comparing the Decision-Making Mechanisms by Transformers and CNNs via Explanation MethodsMingqi Jiang, Saeed Khorram, Fuxin LiCVPR 2024
它引用的顶会 Paper1
相关 Paper
- ACAT: Adversarial Counterfactual Attention for Classification and Detection in Medical ImagingAlessandro Fontanella, Antreas Antoniou, Wenwen Li, Joanna M. Wardlaw 等ICML 2023 · 被引用 15 次
- Counterfactual-based Saliency Map: Towards Visual Contrastive Explanations for Neural NetworksXue Wang, Zhibo Wang, Haiqin Weng, Hengchang Guo 等ICCV 2023 · 被引用 15 次
- Do Users Benefit From Interpretable Vision? A User Study, Baseline, And DatasetLeon Sixt, Martin Schuessler, Oana-Iuliana Popescu, Philipp Weiß 等ICLR 2022 · 被引用 21 次
- SCOUT: Self-Aware Discriminant Counterfactual ExplanationsPei Wang, Nuno VasconcelosCVPR 2020
- Interpretable Graph Capsule Networks for Object RecognitionJindong GuAAAI 2021 · 被引用 42 次
