MIST: Defending Against Membership Inference Attacks Through Membership-Invariant Subspace Training
Jiacheng Li, Ninghui Li, Bruno Ribeiro
摘要
In Member Inference (MI) attacks, the adversary try to determine whether an instance is used to train a machine learning (ML) model. MI attacks are a major privacy concern when using private data to train ML models. Most MI attacks in the literature take advantage of the fact that ML models are trained to fit the training data well, and thus have very low loss on training instances. Most defenses against MI attacks therefore try to make the model fit the training data less well. Doing so, however, generally results in lower accuracy. We observe that training instances have different degrees of vulnerability to MI attacks. Most instances will have low loss even when not included in training. For these instances, the model can fit them well without concerns of MI attacks. An effective defense only needs to (possibly implicitly) identify instances that are vulnerable to MI attacks and avoids overfitting them. A major challenge is how to achieve such an effect in an efficient training process. Leveraging two distinct recent advancements in representation learning: counterfactually-invariant representations and subspace learning methods, we introduce a novel Membership-Invariant Subspace Training (MIST) method to defend against MI attacks. MIST avoids overfitting the vulnerable instances without significant impact on other instances. We have conducted extensive experimental studies, comparing MIST with various other state-of-the-art (SOTA) MI defenses against several SOTA MI attacks. We find that MIST outperforms other defenses while resulting in minimal reduction in testing accuracy.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper4
- Learnability and Privacy Vulnerability are Entangled in a Few Critical WeightsXingli Fang, Jung-Eun KimICLR 2026 · 被引用 1 次
- A Unified Defense Framework Against Membership Inference in Federated Learning via Distillation and Contribution-Aware AggregationLiwei Zhang, Linghui Li, Xiaotian Si, Ziduo Guo 等NDSS 2026 · 被引用 1 次
- Membership Inference Attacks as Privacy Tools: Reliability, Disparity and EnsembleZhiqi Wang, Chengyu Zhang, Yuetian Chen, Nathalie Baracaldo 等CCS 2025
- Auditing -differential privacy in one runSaeed Mahloujifar, Luca Melis, Kamalika ChaudhuriICML 2025
它引用的顶会 Paper28
- Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural NetworksNicholas Carlini, David A. WagnerS&P 2017 · 被引用 9,786 次
- Deep Learning with Differential PrivacyMartín Abadi, Andy Chu, Ian J. Goodfellow, H. Brendan McMahan 等CCS 2016 · 被引用 7,620 次
- Zero-Shot Text-to-Image GenerationAditya Ramesh, Mikhail Pavlov, Gabriel Goh, Scott Gray 等ICML 2021 · 被引用 6,356 次
- Membership Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning ModelsReza Shokri, Marco Stronati, Congzheng Song, Vitaly ShmatikovS&P 2017 · 被引用 5,137 次
- Comprehensive Privacy Analysis of Deep Learning: Passive and Active White-box Inference Attacks against Centralized and Federated LearningMilad Nasr, Reza Shokri, Amir HoumansadrS&P 2019 · 被引用 1,778 次
相关 Paper
- RelaxLoss: Defending Membership Inference Attacks without Losing UtilityDingfan Chen, Ning Yu, Mario FritzICLR 2022 · 被引用 61 次
- Overconfidence is a Dangerous Thing: Mitigating Membership Inference Attacks by Enforcing Less Confident PredictionZitao Chen, Karthik PattabiramanNDSS 2024
- Mixup Training for Generative Models to Defend Membership Inference AttacksZhe Ji, Qiansiqi Hu, Liyao Xiang, Chenghu ZhouINFOCOM 2023 · 被引用 3 次
- Stolen Memories: Leveraging Model Memorization for Calibrated White-Box Membership InferenceKlas Leino, Matt FredriksonUSENIX Security 2020
- Inf2Guard: An Information-Theoretic Framework for Learning Privacy-Preserving Representations against Inference AttacksSayedeh Leila Noorbakhsh, Binghui Zhang, Yuan Hong, Binghui WangUSENIX Security 2024 · 被引用 17 次
