Reductions from Module Lattices to Free Module Lattices, and Application to Dequantizing Module-LLL
Gabrielle De Micheli, Daniele Micciancio, Alice Pellet-Mary, Nam Tran
摘要
. In this article, we give evidence that free modules (i.e., modules which admit a basis) are no weaker than arbitrary modules, when it comes to solving cryptographic algorithmic problems (and when the rank of the module is at least 2). More precisely, we show that for three algorithmic problems used in cryptography, namely the shortest vector problem, the Hermite shortest vector problem and a variant of the closest vector problem, there is a reduction from solving the problem in any module of rank n ≥ 2 to solving the problem in any free module of the same rank n . As an application, we show that this can be used to de-quantize the LLL algorithm for module lattices presented by Lee et al. (Asiacrypt 2019).
问问这篇 Paper
问问你的智能体。
Lune 读过与它相关的顶会 Paper,每个回答都会注明依据哪几篇。
相关 Paper
- Average Hardness of SIVP for Module Lattices of Fixed RankKoen de Boer, Aurel Page, Radu Toma, Benjamin WesolowskiSTOC 2026 · 被引用 5 次
- Lattice Reduction for Modules, or How to Reduce ModuleSVP to ModuleSVPTamalika Mukherjee, Noah Stephens-DavidowitzCRYPTO 2020 · 被引用 16 次
- Slide Reduction, Revisited - Filling the Gaps in SVP ApproximationDivesh Aggarwal, Jianwei Li, Phong Q. Nguyen, Noah Stephens-DavidowitzCRYPTO 2020 · 被引用 33 次
- Dimension-Reducing Algorithms for Quaternion Ideal-SVPCong Ling, Andrew Mendelsohn, Christian PorterEUROCRYPT 2026
- On the Ideal Shortest Vector Problem over Random Rational PrimesYanbin Pan, Jun Xu, Nick Wadleigh, Qi ChengEUROCRYPT 2021 · 被引用 17 次
