Compositional Security Definitions for Higher-Order Where Declassification
Jan Menz, Andrew K. Hirsch, Peixuan Li, Deepak Garg
摘要
To ensure programs do not leak private data, we often want to be able to provide formal guarantees ensuring such data is handled correctly. Often, we cannot keep such data secret entirely; instead programmers specify how private data may bedeclassified. While security definitions for declassification exist, they mostly do not handle higher-order programs. In fact, in the higher-order setting no compositional security definition exists for intensional information-flow properties such aswheredeclassification, which allows declassification in specific parts of a program. We use logical relations to build a model (and thus security definition) of where declassification. The key insight required for our model is that we must stop enforcing indistinguishability once arelevant declassificationhas occurred. We show that the resulting security definition provides more security than the most related previous definition, which is for the lower-order setting.
问问这篇 Paper
问问你的智能体。
Lune 读过与它相关的顶会 Paper,每个回答都会注明依据哪几篇。
相关 Paper
- Structural Information Flow: A Fresh Look at Types for Non-interferenceHemant Gouni, Frank Pfenning, Jonathan AldrichOOPSLA 2025 · 被引用 1 次
- Assume but Verify: Deductive Verification of Leaked Information in Concurrent ApplicationsToby Murray, Mukesh Tiwari, Gidon Ernst, David A. NaumannCCS 2023
- Declassification Policy for Program Complexity AnalysisEmmanuel Hainry, Bruce M. Kapron, Jean-Yves Marion, Romain PéchouxLICS 2024
- Reconciling Shannon and Scott with a Lattice of Computable InformationSebastian Hunt, David Sands, Sandro StuckiPOPL 2023 · 被引用 1 次
- Nonmalleable Information Flow ControlEthan Cecchetti, Andrew C. Myers, Owen ArdenCCS 2017 · 被引用 49 次
