Lune

ICLR2025顶会

Beyond correlation: The impact of human uncertainty in measuring the effectiveness of automatic evaluation and LLM-as-a-judge

Aparna Elangovan, Lei Xu, Jongwoo Ko, Mahsa Elyasi, Ling Liu, Sravan Babu Bodapati, Dan Roth

2025年份
5顶会引用

摘要

The effectiveness of automatic evaluation of generative models is typically measured by comparing the labels generated via automation with labels by humans using correlation metrics. However, metrics like Krippendorff's α and Randolph's κ were originally designed to measure the reliability of human labeling, thus make assumptions about typical human labeling behavior, and these assumptions may not be applicable to machine generated labels. In this paper, we show how relying on a single aggregate correlation score can obscure fundamental differences between human labels and those from automatic evaluation, including LLM-asa-Judge. Specifically, we demonstrate that when the proportion of samples with variation or uncertainty in human assigned labels is relatively high, machine labels (generated by automatic evaluation methods) may superficially appear to have similar or better correlation with the human majority label compared to the human-to-human (HH) correlation. This can create the illusion that labels from automatic evaluation approximates the human majority label. However, as the proportion of samples with consistent human labels increases, the correlation between machine and human labels fall well below HH correlation. Based on these findings, we first propose stratifying data by human label uncertainty to provide a more robust analysis of automatic evaluation performance. Second, recognizing that uncertainty and variation are inherent in perception-based human evaluations, such as those involving attitudes or preferences, we introduce a new metric -binned Jensen-Shannon Divergence for perception for such scenarios to better measure the effectiveness of automatic evaluations. Third, we present visualization techniques -perception charts, to contextualize correlation measures appropriately and to show the strengths and limitations of automatic evaluation. We have open-sourced our analysis and visualization tools at https://github.com/amazon-science/BeyondCorrelation .

问问这篇 Paper

智能体会读完全文。

Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。

可以从这些问题问起

智能体调用

Luneget_paper_fulltext

在 Lune 里问

免费开始,无需绑卡

引用它的顶会 Paper5

问问它们各自怎么用它

它引用的顶会 Paper10

相关 Paper

黄昏的海面,两侧是细线勾勒的悬崖